Troilminator. wrote:
Trumpers favorite move, Don the Con mastered it as he fake HardLoper out and got his vote for ignorance. As unexpected, he won and he points and blames someone else, right out of the repuke dribble handbook. Poor baby sore loser:(
What is this repuke dribble you are talk about here?
Flagpole wrote:
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
You had better start writing because of the way you keep gleefully taking their bait. The propaganda all over the Internet uses the term "collusion" for a reason. The reason is, there is no such thing as political collusion.
Did Trump launder money? Very, very, very likely. Did Trump attempt to profit from running a Presidential campaign and now as President? Very likely. Is there a long list of other offenses? Very likely.
Will any of it end up in impeachment? Nobody knows.
Will there be some kind of Constitutional crisis? Likely.
Will there be criminal charges for the clown? Very unlikely. Worst case scenario is he's pardoned. That the worst case.
I have accounted for "collusion" many times including an earlier post from today when I listed the crimes he will be charged with:
"Conspiracy with Russia. Might be in the form of Bribery, but it will be whatever they decide is the appropriate legal version of collusion. Could be Conspiracy against the United States of America."
1) Impeachment and conviction or resignation will happen.
2) Constitutional crisis? I agree likely but not for sure.
3) When you are pardoned, you have to admit that you are guilty of the charges. I have long said he likely will not spend time in prison, probably due to a combination of pardon and plea bargain. The CHARGES will be there though and some will be dropped due to his plea bargain which I have said several times. If he's pardoned though...to be crystal clear about this, that means he admits guilt. Doesn't matter what he says afterwards (and he will lie to the end of his days), to accept a pardon, admitting guilt is part of that.
This is hilarious!!!! when you consider all of those that Obama pardoned, down right hilarious!!!!
Trump finishes his first term.
Mueller is not coming.
Flagpole will be wrong and make excuse after excuse after excuse which is what he does every time he's wrong.
Flagpole now knows that he's wrong and he's already started to craft excuses that only the moronic left will believe.
Christmas will come and he'll still be President and he will complete his term.
Flagpole Fails Again!!!!
Flagpole wrote:
Rigged for Hillary, probably wrote:
So Flagpole really believes a ton of voters in the country voted for Donald because of Facebook.
That is mental talk.
Flagpole, go back on your meds.
Mueller is done and he's not coming.
Trump will complete his first term, guaranteed.
Flagpole, the clown, is put to shame once again.
I have never said voters voted for Trump because of Facebook, so you are wrong there.
We can not know for sure if the cheating Trump engaged in (which will be discovered) changed the outcome of the election or not...it is the attempt itself that is cheating and illegal and will make him have to leave the office...if Avenatti or the DNC or the Southern District of New York doesn't get him first.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Yes you did, many pages ago. You clearly wrote that ads were place by the Russians to persuade people to NOT vote for Hillary but vote for Trump. It doesn't have to be verbatim, it's what you wrote. No one on this thread lies more than you. Glad you've lost lots of money and are still pissed about Trump beating her!
You call people out on spelling, yet you screw up all the time. God tell me that you haven't fathered children, please tell me it isn't so? If so, they're hopeless as you're mind is so biased who would believe you as there is no other side.
Give it up. Trump won and he will not be impeached or resign, you're just hoping so as you've went on and on about it but are too embarrassed to admit that it's not going to happen. Hillary sucked as a Senator and yes, she ran for President and got beat, deal with it fat man!
re8e3lguasu343flisuf wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
I have never said voters voted for Trump because of Facebook, so you are wrong there.
We can not know for sure if the cheating Trump engaged in (which will be discovered) changed the outcome of the election or not...it is the attempt itself that is cheating and illegal and will make him have to leave the office...if Avenatti or the DNC or the Southern District of New York doesn't get him first.
Mueller is coming.
The clown is done.
Yes you did, many pages ago. You clearly wrote that ads were place by the Russians to persuade people to NOT vote for Hillary but vote for Trump. It doesn't have to be verbatim, it's what you wrote. No one on this thread lies more than you. Glad you've lost lots of money and are still pissed about Trump beating her!
You call people out on spelling, yet you screw up all the time. God tell me that you haven't fathered children, please tell me it isn't so? If so, they're hopeless as you're mind is so biased who would believe you as there is no other side.
Give it up. Trump won and he will not be impeached or resign, you're just hoping so as you've went on and on about it but are too embarrassed to admit that it's not going to happen. Hillary sucked as a Senator and yes, she ran for President and got beat, deal with it fat man!
Of course Trump is going to be done. He's a criminal consorting with Commies.
re8e3lguasu343flisuf wrote:
Give it up. Trump won and he will .... Hillary sucked as a Senator and yes, she ran for President and got beat ....
A post of desperation. The criminal Trump is DONE!
More info on the Obama/FBI spy in the Trump campaign. Apparently the spy (still unknown) told Papadopolous that the Trump campaign had access to Hillary's emails via Russia. PapaD was then set up to talk to another FBI inside player where they get him drunk. He then spills that Trump has access to emails via Russia, which the Trump campaign did not actually have, and then the 2nd FBI player uses this revelation as evidence that an investigation needs to happen.
This is the same way the phony Hillary dossier was laundered to make it look like legitimate intel so that a special council would have to be formed.
Again, Obama inserting a spy into a presidential campaign to set him up for a crime is waaaaay worse than Nixon's Watergate offense where all they did was try to bug the local Democrat office. We are living through a civil war with the American people and representative democracy on one side, versus the corrupt government establishment led by Democrats and Liberals on the other. The American people and democracy MUST win.
You guys in the rat maze will never know it but this is probably the second worst scandal in US history, after Obama's IRS persecution of Tea Party groups to steal an election of course. That's still #1. Its a shame that you're going to miss all this fascinating history. Don't worry though. I'll remember it, and if you ever emerge from the maze and start seeing the world as it really is, just let me know and I'll tell you about everything you missed.
re8e3lguasu343flisuf wrote:
God tell me that you haven't fathered children, please tell me it isn't so? If so, they're hopeless as you're mind is so biased who would believe you as there is no other side.
I practically can hear you're short-circuiting brane. If so, tell me it isn't so because of you're bias!
Boom! Avenatti has a lot of 'splaining' to do. He's looking more and more like a two-bit ambulance chasing shyster.
He owes people money, failed to even file his law firm's income tax returns for 2014, 2015, and 2016. He certainly loves the camera, but now he's been exposed.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/30614/avenatti-threatens-journalists-after-bombshell-ryan-saavedra
His past is catching up to him. Plenty of skeletons in his closet.
http://dailycaller.com/2018/05/13/michael-avenatti-past-history/
DiscoGary wrote:
More info on the Obama/FBI spy in the Trump campaign. Apparently the spy (still unknown) told Papadopolous that the Trump campaign had access to Hillary's emails via Russia. PapaD was then set up to talk to another FBI inside player where they get him drunk. He then spills that Trump has access to emails via Russia, which the Trump campaign did not actually have, and then the 2nd FBI player uses this revelation as evidence that an investigation needs to happen.
This is the same way the phony Hillary dossier was laundered to make it look like legitimate intel so that a special council would have to be formed.
Source?
Nevermind, found it:
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2018/05/14/know-name-spy-fbi-put-trump-campaign/Ideas like "US intelligence agencies are run by liberals" or "the Steele Dossier was created so it could be strategically deployed against Trump AFTER the election" continue to be hilarious.
By the way, that wasn't a subtle call to arms against your fellow Americans, was it Gary? Still conveniently omitting the fact that "Obama's IRS" targeted liberal groups, too, I see.
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Boom! Avenatti has a lot of 'splaining' to do. He's looking more and more like a two-bit ambulance chasing shyster.
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-05-10/avenatti-exposed-stormys-lawyer-may-face-disbarrment-legal-action-past-catchesHe owes people money, failed to even file his law firm's income tax returns for 2014, 2015, and 2016. He certainly loves the camera, but now he's been exposed.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/30614/avenatti-threatens-journalists-after-bombshell-ryan-saavedraHis past is catching up to him. Plenty of skeletons in his closet.
http://dailycaller.com/2018/05/13/michael-avenatti-past-history/
Good try, except the Daily Caller isn’t the news, it’s tabloid. He’s got no explaining to do and whatever “dirt” the right keeps trying to dig up is irrelevant to the case. This is almost as pathetic as Trump asking his team to look for dirt on the Iran deal delegation. Your attempts would be funny if you weren’t so desperately rummaging through garage band propaganda machines to support your nonexistent position. Zero hedge... pull your head out of your a$$.
The Gallant Pig Man wrote:
DiscoGary wrote:
More info on the Obama/FBI spy in the Trump campaign. Apparently the spy (still unknown) told Papadopolous that the Trump campaign had access to Hillary's emails via Russia. PapaD was then set up to talk to another FBI inside player where they get him drunk. He then spills that Trump has access to emails via Russia, which the Trump campaign did not actually have, and then the 2nd FBI player uses this revelation as evidence that an investigation needs to happen.
This is the same way the phony Hillary dossier was laundered to make it look like legitimate intel so that a special council would have to be formed.
Source?
Nevermind, found it:
https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2018/05/14/know-name-spy-fbi-put-trump-campaign/Ideas like "US intelligence agencies are run by liberals" or "the Steele Dossier was created so it could be strategically deployed against Trump AFTER the election" continue to be hilarious.
By the way, that wasn't a subtle call to arms against your fellow Americans, was it Gary? Still conveniently omitting the fact that "Obama's IRS" targeted liberal groups, too, I see.
Like I said. You're going to miss all this by allowing yourself to be caught in the rat maze. You will be fed whatever spin is necessary to allow you to continue believing what they want you to believe.
... and you know what? The days of acting like MSM is unbiased news, while conservative news outlets get everything wrong are long gone. That shtick is getting old. Everyone knows the MSM is hard-core left wing and will lie, cheat, and steal to push the Liberal agenda and help Democrats. Everyone knows it. That's settled science. Let's just acknowledge their are two competing points of view and move on.
Point out where it's wrong or quit with the crap.
DiscoGary wrote:
... and you know what? The days of acting like MSM is unbiased news, while conservative news outlets get everything wrong are long gone.
Yes, it has been obvious to everyone, except brain use limited trumpers, the conservative news outlets have gotten everything wrong. Conservative news outlets = 100% FAKE news.
DiscoGary wrote:
... and you know what? The days of acting like I am a moderately sane person are long gone. That shtick is getting old. Everyone knows that I will lie, cheat, and steal to push the fabricated pile of lies that I have fallen for hook line and sinker. Everyone knows it. That's settled science. Let's just acknowledge I am an idiot and move on.
There. Done.
Just because accurately reporting the deeds of the current US president lets him look like a corrupt and incompetent moron motivated by spite and haplessly clueless about what he is doing, doesn't mean the mainstream media is biased.
It just means that the US president is a corrupt and incompetent moron motivated by spite and haplessly clueless about what he is doing.
Those are all links to news sites with no credibility, whatsoever. Therefore, you have served up another nothing burger. This also makes it more and more likely that Trump is "done" as Flagpole has stated all along. It reeks of desperation.
Noticer of idiots wrote:
Those are all links to news sites with no credibility, whatsoever. Therefore, you have served up another nothing burger. This also makes it more and more likely that Trump is "done" as Flagpole has stated all along. It reeks of desperation.
Desperation is Lying Gary's middle name.
Lying Desperation Gary. Desperately trying to save white males in this country from limitless, hate-filled prejudice and ultimately from extermination camps.
Right, Lying Gary? That IS your mission, right?
DiscoGary wrote:
Like I said. You're going to miss all this by allowing yourself to be caught in the rat maze. You will be fed whatever spin is necessary to allow you to continue believing what they want you to believe.
I read the transcript (which contains no real evidence of anything), I keep tabs on Breitbart, I tune-in to conservative talk radio, I never watch teevee news. So what rat maze are you talking about? It's not like I'm being denied relevant information here. I've surveyed the available evidence and determined that your side is extremely disagreeable.
DiscoGary wrote:
... and you know what? The days of acting like MSM is unbiased news, while conservative news outlets get everything wrong are long gone. That shtick is getting old. Everyone knows the MSM is hard-core left wing and will lie, cheat, and steal to push the Liberal agenda and help Democrats. Everyone knows it. That's settled science.
No. The MSM is not hard-core left wing. It is constantly undermining the liberal agenda. Let's take, for example, the most lefty mainstream publication of them all, the NY Times. The Op-Ed page for the NY Times does not employ a single Bernie supporter. It does, however, employ a host of conservatives (Douthat, the Brooks Brothers, Stephens) who might not support Trump but would happily return to the fold under someone civil, like Pence. Leading up the the election, it published an erroneous article titled "Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia" while devoting article after article to the subject of Hillary Clinton's emails. They probably did more to sway the outcome of the election than Breitbart. The NY Times' White House reporters essentially operate as stenographers. They have no will to call Trump officials like Sarah Sanders liars when they lie. (In fact, they say it's not their job to do that!) When interviewing Trump, they have never pressed him to explain himself when he says something wrong or nonsensical.
A few questions:
Do any of your favored right-wing publications host any liberal writers?
Do they publish features telling conservatives that the key to winning is to be nicer to liberals?
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/12/opinion/sunday/liberals-youre-not-as-smart-as-you-think-you-are.htmlDo they constantly run articles talking about the dangers of conservative intolerance for opposing views?
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/08/opinion/intellectual-dark-web.htmlDo they attempt to provide both sides of practically every argument in the name of balance? Do they frequently run articles urging Republican strategists to seek out more moderate positions to win-over conservative Democrats?
There is no comparison. Honestly, I'm a little envious of you. If the New York Times actually operated like a Breitbart for the liberal cause, the current political landscape would look completely different. At least they still do some real reporting and break important stories. Right-wing media rarely breaks any actual news unless it's related to illegal immigration in some way.
new here wrote:
re8e3lguasu343flisuf wrote:
Yes you did, many pages ago. You clearly wrote that ads were place by the Russians to persuade people to NOT vote for Hillary but vote for Trump. It doesn't have to be verbatim, it's what you wrote. No one on this thread lies more than you. Glad you've lost lots of money and are still pissed about Trump beating her!
You call people out on spelling, yet you screw up all the time. God tell me that you haven't fathered children, please tell me it isn't so? If so, they're hopeless as you're mind is so biased who would believe you as there is no other side.
Give it up. Trump won and he will not be impeached or resign, you're just hoping so as you've went on and on about it but are too embarrassed to admit that it's not going to happen. Hillary sucked as a Senator and yes, she ran for President and got beat, deal with it fat man!
Of course Trump is going to be done. He's a criminal consorting with Commies.
Wow, how weak flagpole. A 2nd grader could come back with something better.
Give it up wrote:
re8e3lguasu343flisuf wrote:
Give it up. Trump won and he will .... Hillary sucked as a Senator and yes, she ran for President and got beat ....
A post of desperation. The criminal Trump is DONE!
Yes, the Dumbocrats are desperate for a candidate better than the crooked witch. Libs suck!