And the peer reviewed studies that showed them to “not be addictive”? That was your comparison. you said the more studies that show no link means the more likely it is true. So show me all of the studies showing that there is no addictive link with those drugs.
Huh? Guess you are talking about Oxy. Which was highly addictive and was known to be so per studies the Sacklers had done on it. Yet they hid those and submitted data showing it not to be addictive and FDA approved and it was marketed as non addictive.
What is your argument? That FDA approved based on studies that showed it to be addictive?
So you don’t have studies that Oxy was not addictive? Then it is not comparable.
He can go for it. He's a top scientific mind. understands the scientific method extremely well. And will find something in a few months that the worlds best biostatisticians and scientists haven't been able to parcel out for decades. He'll also do it with a team that's now missing all of the CDC specialist researchers they've fired in recent weeks.
He's got the best and brightest on the job. They'll bring clarity to the situation that has previously been unattainable.
Don't be so naive. Some people undoubtedly know what is causing this explosion in autism. They don't want RFKs people looking into it
It's the tinfoil hat lobby. Who knows that the loonies will do if RFK reveals the true cause of autism is environmental or diagnostic.
big thinker learns that there are conflicts of interest in the world. determines that thousands of scientists and researchers must be wrong. the logical answer has to be that everyone who trains to explore the question is wrong and one man ( who's entire career is funded by conflicts of interest) must be right simply on the basis of having a contrarian point of view supported by a podcaster in texas.
big thinker learns that there are conflicts of interest in the world. determines that thousands of scientists and researchers must be wrong. the logical answer has to be that everyone who trains to explore the question is wrong and one man ( who's entire career is funded by conflicts of interest) must be right simply on the basis of having a contrarian point of view supported by a podcaster in texas.
I keep coming back to the scientists and healthcare professionals that have dedicated their lives to their craft. And have more smarts in their pinky toe than RFK Jr. Imagine these ones listening to RFK Jr and seeing a portion of the nation rally around his hare brained theories. It must be infuriating.
has to be crazy. Imaging spending 10 years researching autism or vaccine side effects. thousands of hours. all the data review. treating patients first hand.
then this raspy voiced dude who misread some old studies and wrote a weird book about what you do day to day is now in charge of it all.
It's like if a really bad fantasy football coach and regular call in listener to a sports radio station was named coach of the Indianapolis colts. Because they got some online traction for having an opinion that the secondary was lazy in games played at stadiums with closed roofs (defense stats don't support the claim).
Wow! Amazing news! Such specificity as to the date too! It’s really incredible that they will be able to figure this out so quickly when so much money, time, and brain power has been spent on researching this issue by people with advanced degrees in the hard sciences, medical sciences, and epidemiology. It’s almost as if the Trump and his administration have the answer even before the question has been asked and the research has been done! They are clearly faithfully applying the scientific method to this vexing (vaxxing?) question. MAGA!!!!! MAHA!!!!!
and in this scenario the fantasy football sports fan doesnt know how player contracts work, how to review game field, what the position coaches do, how to talk to the media, and never played football himself. He's just really passionate about the colts and says they could be better.
has to be crazy. Imaging spending 10 years researching autism or vaccine side effects. thousands of hours. all the data review. treating patients first hand.
then this raspy voiced dude who misread some old studies and wrote a weird book about what you do day to day is now in charge of it all.
It's like if a really bad fantasy football coach and regular call in listener to a sports radio station was named coach of the Indianapolis colts. Because they got some online traction for having an opinion that the secondary was lazy in games played at stadiums with closed roofs (defense stats don't support the claim).
Don’t forget about the heroin addiction that fried his brain.
Or the insane amounts of steroids he currently does.
Make America healthy but inject yourself with tons of steroids
we all know that every danish scientist is in the pocket of big vaccine. and that the danish cant count! the obvious answer here is that the danish perform bad science and that RFK and the scientists he choose to employ (solely because their views match his) will find a better answer in a predetermined amount of calendar days!!
I think what's really important is that the global vaccine market in 2025 is expected to hit $70 billion dollars.
that's ungodly revenue.
I mean that's 1.4% of the total healthcare spending in the united states. so it would have to be like less than 1% of total health expenditures around the globe
Can you imaging the influence and lobbying power that 1.4% of 20% of our GDP has over the entirety of America. Surely big pharma controls everything we eat think and breath. especially vaccines which are the biggest sector of world business.
Is your argument that the FDA approves drugs without studies?
Yes, all the drugs mentioned—Thalidomide, Vioxx, Fen-Phen, DES, Avandia, Baycol, and OxyContin—were approved by the FDA (or equivalent regulatory bodies in other countries, like Thalidomide in Europe).
The FDA approves drugs based on data submitted by the drug’s manufacturer, which conducts or sponsors premarket studies.
So the FDA relies on Big Pharma data and studies. Works real well
And the peer reviewed studies that showed them to “not be addictive”? That was your comparison. you said the more studies that show no link means the more likely it is true. So show me all of the studies showing that there is no addictive link with those drugs.
Yes. Sacklers submitted data that Oxy was not addictive. Ya think the FDA ok'ed the drug as non-addictive without a cover story? Of course, they knew it was addictive and withheld the data that showed that. Use your head
And the peer reviewed studies that showed them to “not be addictive”? That was your comparison. you said the more studies that show no link means the more likely it is true. So show me all of the studies showing that there is no addictive link with those drugs.
Yes. Sacklers submitted data that Oxy was not addictive.
You would think after the Covid jab scam some people would understand we are being conned by Big Pharm. But no; these people continue to fall for the same BS
You would think after the Covid jab scam some people would understand we are being conned by Big Pharm. But no; these people continue to fall for the same BS
People in my age group had a 25-30 times greater chance of being admitted to the hospital unvaxxed vs. vaxxed. Earlier in the pandemic it was about 60 times greater, according to Alberta stats. These huge multiplers were the same for chances of being admitted to the ICU and dying. And the costif an ICU stay was about 100k, which was a lot of funds to spend on ignorant people who were unvaxxed.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.