Armstronglivs wrote:
ej7 wrote:
Hence our dialogue, Kiwi MacTurdson.
Still engaging with the voices in your head, I see.
The voices are replying all the way from NZ, turdbreath.
Armstronglivs wrote:
ej7 wrote:
Hence our dialogue, Kiwi MacTurdson.
Still engaging with the voices in your head, I see.
The voices are replying all the way from NZ, turdbreath.
rekrunner wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
The master of projection himself.
Are we in third grade? Seriously? "I know you are but what am I?"
It's comical to watch the same pattern play out in every thread you participate in, as it predictably degrades into a cycle of exchanging 3rd grade level personal insults and responses rather than substantive content.
Speaking for myself, you keep emphasizing doping is widespread, even at the top, including Nadal, as if the question of prevalence at the top of tennis were ever under dispute.
Let's assume Nadal is doping because everyone is doping, for the sake of putting that red-herring to the side. The topic of your thread is not that he dopes, but that "Nadal shows ..."
The doubts I have about the content of your posts, is that 1) you suggest something "magical" happened, and 2) only doping has these "magical" properties.
I don't find it all that surprising that the world #2 ranked 34 year old specialist on clay, beat the #1 ranked 33 year old, in a tournament on clay.
PS: If anyone is keeping score, I disagree with Allen53 and Sprintgeezer about other topics in other threads, but in this one about tennis, they schooled you.
The verdict of an unwavering doping denier means nothing on this subject. Your arguments also show you know very little about the sport of tennis.
ej7 wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Still engaging with the voices in your head, I see.
The voices are replying all the way from NZ, turdbreath.
There is no limit to your delusions. There is however to your vocabulary.
Are we in third grade? Seriously?[/quote]
You might not want to answer that question.
Armstronglivs wrote:
Dope Hardstrong wrote:
And here goes another full day of you lashing out childishly.
But you claim to not like pigs.
Well, there you go again - identifying with another humble creature. A moment of rare insight.
They are apparently one of the smartest but you only want to wrestle with them rather than acquire knowledge.
rekrunner wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
The master of projection himself.
Are we in third grade? Seriously? "I know you are but what am I?"
It's comical to watch the same pattern play out in every thread you participate in, as it predictably degrades into a cycle of exchanging 3rd grade level personal insults and responses rather than substantive content.
Speaking for myself, you keep emphasizing doping is widespread, even at the top, including Nadal, as if the question of prevalence at the top of tennis were ever under dispute.
Let's assume Nadal is doping because everyone is doping, for the sake of putting that red-herring to the side. The topic of your thread is not that he dopes, but that "Nadal shows ..."
The doubts I have about the content of your posts, is that 1) you suggest something "magical" happened, and 2) only doping has these "magical" properties.
I don't find it all that surprising that the world #2 ranked 34 year old specialist on clay, beat the #1 ranked 33 year old, in a tournament on clay.
PS: If anyone is keeping score, I disagree with Allen53 and Sprintgeezer about other topics in other threads, but in this one about tennis, they schooled you.
Let's hereby call his disorder "Trumpism."
https://theconversation.com/the-psychology-of-insults-71738Dope Hardstrong wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Well, there you go again - identifying with another humble creature. A moment of rare insight.
They are apparently one of the smartest but you only want to wrestle with them rather than acquire knowledge.
Well I accept they are probably smarter than you.
Dope Hardstrong wrote:
rekrunner wrote:
Are we in third grade? Seriously? "I know you are but what am I?"
It's comical to watch the same pattern play out in every thread you participate in, as it predictably degrades into a cycle of exchanging 3rd grade level personal insults and responses rather than substantive content.
Speaking for myself, you keep emphasizing doping is widespread, even at the top, including Nadal, as if the question of prevalence at the top of tennis were ever under dispute.
Let's assume Nadal is doping because everyone is doping, for the sake of putting that red-herring to the side. The topic of your thread is not that he dopes, but that "Nadal shows ..."
The doubts I have about the content of your posts, is that 1) you suggest something "magical" happened, and 2) only doping has these "magical" properties.
I don't find it all that surprising that the world #2 ranked 34 year old specialist on clay, beat the #1 ranked 33 year old, in a tournament on clay.
PS: If anyone is keeping score, I disagree with Allen53 and Sprintgeezer about other topics in other threads, but in this one about tennis, they schooled you.
Let's hereby call his disorder "Trumpism."
https://theconversation.com/the-psychology-of-insults-71738
Definitely your kind of guy. Beyond a certain witlessness, you have something else in common - a surfeit of wounded narcissism. You are as obsessed with me as he is with Obama - because we remind you of the losers that you are.
You came up Trumps again.
Be better. You're 64 years old. Fight regression.
Dope Hardstrong wrote:
You came up Trumps again.
Be better. You're 64 years old. Fight regression.
So still obsessed.
Dope Hardstrong wrote:
https://www.healthline.com/health/mental-health/age-regression#types
And so the obsession goes on. Ironic that it comes from a 50 year old who still thinks he's 20.
But you won't give up. You'll keep trying - and failing. A narcissist like Trump - and you - can never admit they have lost.
Some people will try to protect current establishment no matter what ... ...
Even when it becomes so obvious like
When
Have 15-16 year old athletes doping on the speed peptide and going from 11 seconds down to 10.30 ,
running like adults , due to nerves sys.
Or other end of scale for older athlete.
This is so dirty , this dope in many cases is making these sprinters forcing progression far beyond natural at important age of development.
As I said was there a time before this base dope that people were fixed on best body type for sprinter .
Average height and muscle has now become tall and skinny , what changed
Or
Here is another one , different arena.
And
the oh everybody is doping conundrum
when very much about timing ,getting
it first before becomes banned or
widespread and can't stand out from crowd.
Or is still something need connects to get or various things change ,testing etc.
Currently have the speed peptide ongoing
as examples of such dope And
whatever this new endurance stuff is.
Previously good example would of being Cera and hand full of selected athletes that benefited big time from it before called day on that
Let's suspend our disbelief here.
Leicester city win premiership by 15 points
After season where at one stage were 15 points at bottom all with almost same squad.
This just doesn't happen in that league.
So only one way to explain
Doping whole squads or many players is another level of dirty again
and showed where we are in terms of that
vardy was fast but now easily fastest over 10-20 yards.
Oh but then everyone is doping .
You know many other variables.
Here being who you know and timing
Doping all about timing ,
Leicester got in there first for England in 2015 then project was finished within two years.
before other English sides started doping more than a few individuals , as in squad.
Now we have Liverpool doing same and in a similar power structure backed by many connected people.
Or let's look at Europe ,
to see many variables to this .
have inter and Atlanta yes Atlanta using similar methods but are they as successful yes and no.
Or
the Germans who started this with Bayern
and super Hans.
in certain time frames
So obvious what going on their at moment
Especially after match with Barca
Almost carbon copy of how Germany beat Brazil in 2014. yes dope
Although in both matches required inferior defense to really show dope at work.
Sport is filthy at moment interms of perception.
this so call war on doping when just a cover.
Same old.
If want could test for all undectable steroids or epos tomorrow but as stands best call them untested rather than undectable.
Similarly with speed peptide easily test but oh know Mr coe would first have to admit it even exists.
Sprinting and sport changed 2005/6
with this base dope.
And Federer was first to avail then Rafa then serb , Again timing. All about timing.
Younger players are and try to do same methods but years behind in terms of finely tuned process and only leveling field somewhat.
whereas in Federer era had that advantage over field bar odd player for years.
Starting to see difference .... .... Timing
Or
who benefited most from Cera from 2001 way before hit markets
was maybe ten or so , was kept quite select until ramsi.
certain Ethiopian being biggest benefactor.
Or
Current endurance ped seems obvious the select few , any long distance record in past few years yes.
one Canadian , one Australian , afew Norwegians .
Simple as getting this stuff in post.
Or
Let's go way back to early 80's
And the other paradigm shift in sprinting
involving dope.
Hgh and roids .
The other shift in sprints at same time was heavy lifting and certain Canadian hit that good , along with above.
Remembering that hgh without roids does little or heavy heavy lifting becomes difficult and promblematic without roids in sprinting arena , all connected.
Only one individual had this combo on Earth afew years before rest , way before on market.
Then hit the west coast Sprinting scene before rest.
his morphology not to dissimilar to what seeing now as more common , taller and obvious when see largely biochemically the same but alot lesser extent hgh becomes igf in body. squeaky clean Carl.
Now are ye seeing it .
Timing... ...
Physically, which is totally fine.
Fight it. There is no doubt it's true. I'm sure it stings to have it pointed out. Acceptance is your first step.
Armstronglivs wrote:
But you won't give up. You'll keep trying - and failing. A narcissist like Trump - and you - can never admit they have lost.
There is no contest here though.
But you're projecting again.
Dope Hardstrong wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
But you won't give up. You'll keep trying - and failing. A narcissist like Trump - and you - can never admit they have lost.
There is no contest here though.
But you're projecting again.
As I said, you keep coming back. Trying so hard. You're like a little puppy that keeps following me round. Yapping.
Armstronglivs wrote:
Dope Hardstrong wrote:
There is no contest here though.
But you're projecting again.
As I said, you keep coming back. Trying so hard. You're like a little puppy that keeps following me round. Yapping.
Any living thing that tried to follow you around would die in seconds from the putrid stench of your heartless soul.