DJT indicted on four counts related to January 6

In addition to being amusing, it's exactly the kind of non-response that your pretend question(s) deserve.

Rico is a beautiful thing! Thanks Rudy!

Did a criminal conspiracy to unlawfully overturn the election exist? Yes! Easy to prove.

Did a specific defendant commit two or more of these acts in furtherance of this criminal plan? Yes! Easy to prove.

Defendant is guilty of RICO conspiracy as charged.

Before RICO mob bosses were impossible to charge because they had their crime syndicate do the dirty stuff. They just directed it.

thanks again fruity Rudy G! We owe you one!

I'll bet the jury thought it was. I'm absolutely sure they were wondering "why won't he even show up here and deny what she is saying?" If you were on a jury and someone never even showed up, you'd consider it.

On page 19, Post #364 of this very thread you even posted a link of the Fake Electors Indictment (it was a CNN annotated version, no less). You even seem to have alleged that you read it. If you did, you know what Trump actually did and why it is alleged to be illegal. There's no "legalese" in the Indictment, it's written in plain English that even half-wits can usually grasp.

Same with the Bathroom Indictment. I'm sure there is a thread on that Indictment where you admitted you were able to find and read it.

This ploy where you pretend you don't understand the plain English in the Indictments is really pathetic.

Who cares what words she edits to paint her picture? there is a lot that goes into understanding language. did she mention Trump said to Peacefully protest? I’d guess not. she’s a Black Panther tool and most likely Soros funded and she is walking the plank in Georgia alone, besides the Trump hating Governor. it’s another completely fabricated story line and will get smashed when the rubber meets the road. We have a Suprene Court for a reason and you ought to study American Politics to understand its role. we put 3 up there so good luck!

I would pay closer attention to the policy that we will be laying out soon in front of a monster audience, and then we can have something rooted in reality to discuss.

Oh, that’s right, you guys have so many stories in the fire, she’s the one trying to put trump in prison for contesting an election in Stacy Abrams hood. that’s right. she sounds like she has no personal motives at all

He doesn’t come up with this stuff on his own. He is just regurgitating the right wing spin that he hears. For the last few days the spinsters have been claiming “you mean to tell me placing phone calls are illegal? That’s what Fanni Willis is saying!”

They are playing dumb. The acts are not illegal in themselves but the criminal plan is.

Its like a mobster saying: “you mean to tell me going to Home Depot and buying concrete is illegal?”

Of course the crime is the dead guy at the bottom of the East River with blocks tied to his feet.

he knows better. But he is a liar and pretends he is just asking questions.

What do you do at these monster audiences? Jump up and down? Throw your socks around? Do they have free hot dogs and ketchup?

Sounds like Fat Fanni needs to be investigated. We will get to that

Yes, I've seen Newname/Carmine and his Just Asking Questions -- JAQing off -- routine many times (link below). It's his go-to coping mechanism. But in this thread, I think he forgot that he posted he actually read the Indictment.

Actually it sounds like you were more at fault for getting Bribery Joe elected. I doubt Trump voted for him. Last i remember OJ walked out of that courtroom. in any event, to compare anything Fat Fanni made up about the Big Dog DJT, to double murders shows just how far from reality you are. again, I would recommend watching the policy we will lay out because that’s what will really affect you.

Fat Fanni, not the insult that you think it is. 🤡

You are 1 of 3 people, or 1 person being 3 people. Doesn’t matter. Your point of view is definitely unpopular as evidenced by the continual beating you’ve taken in this thread.

Do you think it’s any better received anywhere else?

You’re outnumbered chuckles. Not just here, but everywhere.

Please understand that the DA is just the face of the investigation. There is a team of dozens of investigators and lawyers that put the case together with the backing of county and state officials and money. Many of those officials are republicans who trump has already slandered publicly while demanding their loyalty and repeating the same lies that got him here.

This probably makes his supporters make up conspiracy theories even more. However, the more people involved, the more likely there will be people willing to expose any improper conduct. Example: all the people from the trump admin cooperating with investigators.

As for the argument "I don't understand english, therefore the indictments aren't valid." Well, no real need to expand on that. Google the indictments. There are hundreds of atticles in plain english.

One more thought from the conservative Federalist Society lawyers:

google.com

Trump Is Disqualified From Holding Office, Conservative Law Professors Argue

Two constitutional law academics determined that the Constitution bars Trump from becoming president again due to his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, insurrection.

Open link

He's been listening to too much Ice Cube!

https://genius.com/Ice-cube-it-was-a-good-day-lyrics

Please understand that 158/159 Georgia County DA’s refused to sign off, and that the DA spearheads the others to create a framework for her wannabe crime. time to speak of something serious.

got an election coming up. you e got kids getting killed and sending more bombs to do it. we will lay out our policy while the freak show does more ad nauseum attacks on the next President because they are jealous (every politician dreams of the support Trump gets but none have ever gotten it, in fact you said you don’t even support biden just vote for him) of Trumps support.

so we will give you our policy to stop killing kids. what is yours?

It's not ignorance; it's trolling.

The Block button works pretty well.

30 grand jurors agreed that the charges had merit. Other DAs were not required to sign off on charges. Their signature absense does not imply disagreement. Please use logic.

Thanks for mentioning murdering children. Gun control will help immensly.

Okay, yes: In a civil trial--which hers was--the jury is permitted to make inferences from a party's absence or silence.

In a criminal trial, the jury is instructed to make no inferences or conclusions from the defendant's silence. I've been on multiple juries in criminal cases, and each time the accused didn't say a word--probably a wise choice--and we were instructed to give that no weight.

Of course, in a criminal trial the accused does attend, with very rare exceptions...so Butterbean will be physically present. But he absolutely doesn't have to testify, including denying anything. Again, usually wise: A defendant who testifies in his/her own defense is open to cross examination, which in Butterbean's case(s) would be withering, I'm sure.