Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Flagpole wrote:
Umm...I didn't post that. Reading comprehension improvement should be in your future.
Ok, I was wrong about the posting part, but you supported the ridiculously ultra left-wing Slate article.
And you provided a link to The New Republic who had a publisher-owner-editor, Michael Straight, who was a KGB agent. Good work there, Rigged.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Straightouted wrote:
reuis;aeie'd;ss'2k98484 wrote:
^smells like trollminator on all levels
^ jamin confirms he was outed
^ Trollminator uses another handle>>>"outed">>>is totally triggered
XY wrote:
Troolminator wrote:
The same things applied to Clinton, but that didn't stop you from voting for her numbnuts.
But she didn't win, we're not talking about her no matter how bad she would have been.
If she would have won (minus California's huge popular vote advantage) then you'd be saying "well, she's better than Trump would have been", right?
Trump said grab women by the pu$$y.
The Clinton's did what? See below.
If you biased lefties had an article exactly as below and the name Trump was replaced with Clinton, you'd be saying he's a murderer and where there's smoke there's fire and that it's just too many coincidences to not have some real truth to it.
Hmmmmm....
https://brobible.com/life/article/hilary-clinton-accused-murdering-92-people/And you wonder why you guys can't have a normal forum conversation. That's who the majority of you left wingers voted for and your answer is...go see Snopes, none of it's true, it's all made up. Yeah, ok;)
I think Hillary must be brilliant, to get away with killing 92 people and not getting caught. I imagine she is the greatest serial killer in US history? Props to her, killing 92 people and holding a cabinet level position and raising a family at the same time. And to think that more than half of America voted for a serial killer.
Obviously my comprehension is lacking as the articles didn't claim that "she" committed the actual murders. Sometimes I wonder why my boyfriend doesn't break up with me.
XY [jamin] wrote:
Obviously my comprehension is lacking as the articles didn't claim that "she" committed the actual murders. Sometimes I wonder why my boyfriend doesn't break up with me.
Hardloper will always stand by his guy--you, jamin.
XY wrote:
Troolminator wrote:
The same things applied to Clinton, but that didn't stop you from voting for her numbnuts.
But she didn't win, we're not talking about her no matter how bad she would have been.
If she would have won (minus California's huge popular vote advantage) then you'd be saying "well, she's better than Trump would have been", right?
Trump said grab women by the pu$$y.
The Clinton's did what? See below.
If you biased lefties had an article exactly as below and the name Trump was replaced with Clinton, you'd be saying he's a murderer and where there's smoke there's fire and that it's just too many coincidences to not have some real truth to it.
Hmmmmm....
https://brobible.com/life/article/hilary-clinton-accused-murdering-92-people/And you wonder why you guys can't have a normal forum conversation. That's who the majority of you left wingers voted for and your answer is...go see Snopes, none of it's true, it's all made up. Yeah, ok;)
I think Hillary must be brilliant, to get away with killing 92 people and not getting caught. I imagine she is the greatest serial killer in US history? Props to her, killing 92 people and holding a cabinet level position and raising a family at the same time. And to think that more than half of America voted for a serial killer.
Wow, you're just plain outright stupid!!! LOL!!! No one said Hillary Clinton killed 92 people herself. What a dumb little liberal you are. Glad you've spent over a year on this thread begging to be heard, overly funny when I think about you and the other 6 far left wing nut jobs thinking they'll change anything with their "Super Intelligent Posts", LOL!!!
XY=Douche Bag
uuurrrrttty wrote:
Wow, I AM just plain outright stupid!!!
jamin=Douche Bag
^ jamin is so easily triggered.
Reasonable Republican wrote:
Fat hurts wrote:
I just saw the leaders of North Korea and South Korea shaking hands. Where was Trump?
If you really think Trump was responsible for the thawing in Korean relations, make your case. I've yet to see anyone who can.
If you want to know what a peacemaker actually looks like, review Jimmy Carter and the Camp David accords. No matter what anyone says about Carter as a president, everyone agrees that Carter was personally responsible making peace between Egypt and Israel. Carter brought the two together. Carter was there. Carter did it. And everyone agrees, Carter deserved his Nobel Prize.
Trump tweeted. That's all.
How do you respond to the President of South Korea giving Trump credit for bringing peace between the 2 countries? Or at the very least being the catalyst that allowed that to happen. Do you claim to know more about the situation than him (let me guess you’ll just say he’s sucking up to Trump)?
I would argue that a combination of Trumps tough talk on North Korea (yes the tweets among other things) and the tougher economic sanctions that for the first time in history China followed through on (in my opinion thanks to Trump I’m sure you’ll disagree) helped us get to this point. Of course there are many other factors I think the olympics and China also played big factors.
I dont think Trump deserves all the credit like some on the right but if you want to put a number on it I’d say he deserves a third of the credit with China, NK and SK getting the rest.
Honestly though when I can predict your opinion on every issue your opinion becomes far less valuable at least Flagpole can give Trump some credit. No one is saying that if you admit Trump did something good you have to vote for him you can still be against 99% of the things he does. From a political standpoint which is how we are all viewing this the only thing that matters is how people in the middle perceive this and in my opinion people in the middle will see this as a win for Trump (we’ll see if that translates into votes).
Now a question for you why in 8 years couldn’t obama get the same results Trump has in less that 2 years on the Korean Peninsula?
I don't think my view on the matter is any different from Flagpole. Like him, I'm willing to give Trump the benefit of the doubt that he did something behind the scenes. I'd just like to know what that is before talking Nobel Prize.
Moon's positive comment about Trump just makes the same statement everyone else has made. "Trump got tough" with North Korea. Other than tweets, I still don't see what Trump did. Moon didn't say.
And don't forget, Moon is a politician. His nation relies on the US military for its very existence. So stroking Trump's ego is an obvious political move.
You can perhaps point to tougher sanctions. But sanctions have been ongoing for years. While I agree that more sanctions were needed, sanctions always take years to have an effect.
Here is what's really happening folks. Kim Jong-un now has nuclear ICBM's. He now feels confident that he can try to make a deal from a position of strength. That has been Kim's game plan all along. It never had anything to do with Trump or any other politician.
The New Republic wrote:
And you provided a link to The New Republic who had a publisher-owner-editor, Michael Straight, who was a KGB agent. Good work there, Rigged.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Straight
"Straight left the magazine in 1956 and began writing novels." Dude, sixty-two years ago the Republicans weren't nuts. And the Dems only were a little.
Things change over the course of half a century. Try to keep up.
The New Republic wrote:
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
Ok, I was wrong about the posting part, but you supported the ridiculously ultra left-wing Slate article.
And you provided a link to The New Republic who had a publisher-owner-editor, Michael Straight, who was a KGB agent. Good work there, Rigged.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Straight
He's editing articles from the grave too? He guy died in 2004. If that's all you got, try again.
kinda funny wrote:
I'll definitely be voting for Trump again, especially if the Left and its followers continue to live in bubbles ignoring all the good things happening for our citizenry. Life is good, things are improving. Many many people can feel it.
Here's the thing, kf: Things were improving under Obama, too. (No, I didn't vote for him--I've never pulled the Dem lever for any office.) Yet somehow "many many people" (you?) *couldn't* feel that.
Now why do you think that is? Could they have been "liv[ing] in a bubble"--selecting only news sources that supported their biases, for instance?
I'm not just talking about the economy's improvement: jobless rate going down, seventy-plus consecutive months of job growth, the stock market (at least the S&P 500) nearly tripling, yadda. Those have been explored at mind-numbing length and are established facts.
No, I'm also talking about how overall rates of major crime dropped every year under Obama. Did you "feel" that?
And if not, why not?
http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm[FWIW I agree that DJTrump is (considerably) more-likely-than-not to be the GOP candidate in 2020. But then I also think the GOP will hold on to the Senate this fall and quite likely strengthen its majority. I could be wrong on any of those propositions.]
Rigged for Hillary wrote:
The New Republic wrote:
And you provided a link to The New Republic who had a publisher-owner-editor, Michael Straight, who was a KGB agent. Good work there, Rigged.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_StraightHe's editing articles from the grave too? He guy died in 2004. If that's all you got, try again.
That "The New Republic" article you love so much must be from one of your preferred news sources. Well, if you bothered to read the link it uses an article from "The Intercept" was it's source. Now, here are two articles from "The Intercept" for you to enjoy.
https://theintercept.com/2018/02/16/trump-russia-election-hacking-investigation/https://theintercept.com/2018/04/12/trump-russia-intermediary-joseph-mifsud-missing-case-for-collusion/Snowflake Trump refusing again to attend the WH correspondents’ Dinner, leaving his minion Sarah exposed to the roasting, what a leader. This narcissist is too sensitive about his ego to take any jokes. But of course he gets a pass from the deplorables. Divider in Chief Trump.
Caravan of women and children looking for help.
Kick 'em out!
kibitzer wrote:
I'm not just talking about the economy's improvement: jobless rate going down, seventy-plus consecutive months of job growth, the stock market (at least the S&P 500) nearly tripling, yadda. Those have been explored at mind-numbing length and are established facts.
There were, and still are, classes of employment that haven't seen wage increases in years.
Obamacare seems to have had a couple of bad "holes" that did not help an easily influenced class of worker.
A tripling stock market didn't translate into broad improvements in wealth.
With Obama left to getting things done without Congress, there was no way to address the wealth distribution issues. It's not like Congress would have made it an issue and I doubt Obama would have tried to address it.
pop_pop!_v2.2.1 wrote:
kibitzer wrote:
I'm not just talking about the economy's improvement: jobless rate going down, seventy-plus consecutive months of job growth, the stock market (at least the S&P 500) nearly tripling, yadda. Those have been explored at mind-numbing length and are established facts.
There were, and still are, classes of employment that haven't seen wage increases in years.
Obamacare seems to have had a couple of bad "holes" that did not help an easily influenced class of worker.
A tripling stock market didn't translate into broad improvements in wealth.
With Obama left to getting things done without Congress, there was no way to address the wealth distribution issues. It's not like Congress would have made it an issue and I doubt Obama would have tried to address it.
The general point being, Democrats were poorly positioned.
Trollminator wrote:
Snowflake Trump refusing again to attend the WH correspondents’ Dinner, leaving his minion Sarah exposed to the roasting, what a leader. This narcissist is too sensitive about his ego to take any jokes. But of course he gets a pass from the deplorables. Divider in Chief Trump.
Guess who attended the 2011 WH correspondents Dinner? One Donald J Trump. And guess who got roasted? One Donald J Trump.
Trollminator wrote:
Snowflake Trump refusing again to attend the WH correspondents’ Dinner, leaving his minion Sarah exposed to the roasting, what a leader. This narcissist is too sensitive about his ego to take any jokes. But of course he gets a pass from the deplorables. Divider in Chief Trump.
Guess who attended the 2011 White House Correspondents Dinner? One Donald J Trump. And guess who got roasted that night? One Donald J Trump.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8TwRmX6zs4https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2017/02/26/did-the-2011-white-house-correspondents-dinner-spur-trump-to-run-for-president/uuurrrrttty wrote:
XY wrote:
I think Hillary must be brilliant, to get away with killing 92 people and not getting caught. I imagine she is the greatest serial killer in US history? Props to her, killing 92 people and holding a cabinet level position and raising a family at the same time. And to think that more than half of America voted for a serial killer.
Wow, you're just plain outright stupid!!! LOL!!! No one said Hillary Clinton killed 92 people herself. What a dumb little liberal you are. Glad you've spent over a year on this thread begging to be heard, overly funny when I think about you and the other 6 far left wing nut jobs thinking they'll change anything with their "Super Intelligent Posts", LOL!!!
XY=Douche Bag
OMG, are you serious? Of course you right wingers don't believe that she killed 92 people herself, when you all very well know she was abusing children in the bottom of a pizza parlor in VA at the time.
We Democrats have really screwed things up. Our brains just "aint' right". Sad, but true. Comprehension is a distant relative that we cannot seem to connect with.
I am clearly a messed up old man. Yes, I will seek help soon. Ty