Mr. Flats wrote:
I am responding to the statements you made a few posts ago! Have you already forgotten what those were?
**********
These statements?:
I think the point is being missed. The theory is that standard trainers are restrictive and do not allow your body to absorb shock the way it biomechanicaly evolved to do so. Many have argued that you will get injured less and, thus, improve performance.
Improving your form is good, but really misses the point of changing shoes. I think these are two different topics.
***
Please reread it. I did not say that trainers allow the body to run with correct form. I said that they restrict the natural motion of the foot. So, in obvservation, we are in agreement.
Unless you were refering to this post further back:
***
think the point is being missed. The theory is that standard trainers are restrictive and do not allow your body to absorb shock the way it biomechanicaly evolved to do so. Many have argued that you will get injured less and, thus, improve performance.
Improving your form is good, but really misses the point of changing shoes. I think these are two different topics.
***
Again, I believe that I am in agreement with you here unless you are refering specificaly to my use of the word "form" here. If so, I will agree that proper form cannot technicaly be reached in trainers, but I see the main problem being located at the foot and the ankle which I consider to be more of a reaction that is caused by the size of the heel. In other words, proper form can be achieved up to the point where the heel touches the ground at which point the training shoes disrupts the motion of the ankle and foot....and potential the shin.
Am I more clear? No?