Pray tell how people like Kimberly Zieselman and Alician Weigel benefit by the policies and laws that you and other gender identity ideologues have pushed for which now make it possible for oodles of creepy, dangerous, malevloent men across the USA like Richard Cox here to be legally recognized as women.
If you and other gender identity ideologues genuinely gave a rat's ass about people with rare DSDs like Alicia Weigel and Kimberly Zieselman, you wouldn't constantly bring them up and point to them and their rare medical conditions in the callous, exploitative way you do.
I get the impression that in your heart of hearts, you don't have an ounce of compassion or consideration for people like Weigel and Zeiselman and the difficulties they face in life due to having rare DSDs. You just bring them up again and again and again because you see them and their unusual medical conditions as handy props you can use as weapons in your war against the half of the human race who are female.
Taken as a whole, the steady stream of posts you make in which you trot out photos and footage of individuals with extremely rare DSDs and say "looky here, what about this one?" come off as all too reminiscent of the unsavory, sensationalist stunts of a sleazy sideshow barker shamelessly capitalizing on other people's unfortunate and highly unusual medical conditions for his own gain.
Huh?
This person's biological sex is male. They identify as male gender.
What on earth does that have to do with people identifying as a gender that isn't the same as their biological sex??
Nothing at all.
Your weak "arguments" are an embarrassment to your side.
Yes, this person's biological sex is male. But he "identifies as" a transgender, and used his claim of being transgender to go into several women's and girl's locker rooms and expose his genitals to girls and women there.
Cox allegedly exposed himself in the girl’s locker room at Washington-Liberty High School after identifying himself as transgender.
Arlington Public Schools is addressing "concerns and recent media reports about the presence of a registered sex offender at the Arlington Aquatic Center pools." In a message sent to APS families and pool users Wednesday afte...
Lots of men have done/are doing this because of laws, polices and regulations that say biological males who claim to have a trans gender identity can use girls' and women's locker rooms, toilets, showers, fitting rooms, etc - and can compete in women's and girls's sports.
You seem woefully out touch with what's been going on in the real world.
But it were his daughter, he would like the government to forcibly assign her to a category based on pee-pees vs no-pee-pees.
That is the intellect we are dealing with.
You claimed in an earlier post that you're medical doctor. Yet you've now made several posts speaking of "pee-pees vs no pee-pees." Yikes.
Even more gobsmacking - and hilariously so - you seem to have the daft idea that your peurile posts about "pee-pees vs no pee-pees" make you seem more intelligent and erudite than the legal team that wrote the EO under discussion.
Nobody is comparing gender identification. We are talking about identification of sex. The EO relates to sex and not "gender identification."
Did the standardized test folks remove analogies from the exams for your benefit?
Wow, you really are slow.
You realize that your President said "As of today, it will henceforth be the official policy of the United States government that there are only two genders, male and female" ... right?
Genders. G. E. N. D. E. R. S.
And for the record, the last "standardized test" I took was a perfect SAT.
But there's a difference between what Trump said in his inaugural speech and what's stated in the EO he later signed. And what the EO says is way more important that what he said in the speech.
The speechwriters used "gender" colloquially as an anodyne synonym for sex. But the lawyers who wrote the EO did not. The EO uses the word "sex" to mean sex, and the EO makes it very clear that sex is not "gender" or "gender identity."
BTW, if the SAT really was the last standarized test you took, then there's no way you're "certainly a medical doctor" like you claimed in an earlier post. Even if you did get perfect score. Which from your more recent posts about sex categorization "based on pee-pees vs no pee-pees," I highly doubt.
Pray tell how people like Kimberly Zieselman and Alician Weigel benefit by the policies and laws that you and other gender identity ideologues have pushed for which now make it possible for oodles of creepy, dangerous, malevloent men across the USA like Richard Cox here to be legally recognized as women.
If you and other gender identity ideologues genuinely gave a rat's ass about people with rare DSDs like Alicia Weigel and Kimberly Zieselman, you wouldn't constantly bring them up and point to them and their rare medical conditions in the callous, exploitative way you do.
I get the impression that in your heart of hearts, you don't have an ounce of compassion or consideration for people like Weigel and Zeiselman and the difficulties they face in life due to having rare DSDs. You just bring them up again and again and again because you see them and their unusual medical conditions as handy props you can use as weapons in your war against the half of the human race who are female.
Taken as a whole, the steady stream of posts you make in which you trot out photos and footage of individuals with extremely rare DSDs and say "looky here, what about this one?" come off as all too reminiscent of the unsavory, sensationalist stunts of a sleazy sideshow barker shamelessly capitalizing on other people's unfortunate and highly unusual medical conditions for his own gain.
This guy is not a transwoman, in spite of his claim. I bet he has never seen any psychiatrist about his "gender issue" (if he has any), and if he did, he would be immediately diagnosed as being a cisgender man.
And your impression is 100% wrong. I have more compassion and consideration for people like Weigel and Zieselman than I have for any trans person, including people that I think have genuine gender incongruence. I support trans people because people like Weigel and Zieselman support them (as well as cis women like BJK and Gloria Steinem) and not the other way around.
Arlene Baratz (Katie Baratz's mother) commented "two of my heroes" on this photo. And at least two people with MRKH liked that photo.
No, I didn't call Lazuli Clark "sainted, noble, purehearted, praiseworthy paragons of virtue." I called him "entitled, selfish and pushy."
I also think he is a hypocrite. He was perfectly fine with competing as a male vocalist when it served his interests. But then he insisted on competing on girls' sports teams when it served his interests. I would have respect for Clark if he was willing to compete as a female vocalist, knowing he would have competitive disadvantage.
But no, he would not do that. He knew he could not compete as a female vocalist. So he took an easy way. This not only makes him hypocritical and cowardly, but also puts his claim to female gender identity in serious doubt.
