toxico wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Apparently your parents were not very smart, if intelligence is inherited.
What you fail to grasp, in your ineffable ignorance of the subject, is that variations in genetically inherited intelligence within populations are also quite consistent with the same variations occurring in the same way within populations of different races. Hence, no race is inherently more intelligent than any other, and the same general pattern of intelligence distribution applies to all races.
The accepted view of science today is the race does not explain differences in IQ test results, but culture, educational opportunity (or the lack of it), and poverty will. Parents with social advantages will confer these on their children - as well as the converse being true, that social disadvantage will have an affect on the development of individuals from poorer groups in society. It is also the case that in intelligence distribution there is a regression to the mean, which means that highly intelligent parents are less likely to have children as intelligent as they are, otherwise the population would become progressively more intelligent - or more stupid, as very dull or impaired parents would tend to produce children less able than themselves. Mostly, they don't. The Bell curve remains consistent.
Your utter ignorance of this subject is matched only by your insistent arrogance in arguing what you know nothing about, and thereby continuing to propagate a poisonous view that race is a factor in intelligence. Yes - you would have made a good Nazi, since they argued what you do.
So much hot air SJW blather. You’d be better served by completing the simple assignment I gave you, cuckyboy: find a peer reviewed scientific paper that shows no correlation between race and intelligence. You keep returning with papers with over evidence to the opposite and with your cuckyboy excuses.
Agnosticism fired not mean a belief that “race is a factor in intelligence”, you wondrously demented chowderhead, incapable of basic logic. Just blather.
Against what modern science holds, yours is the belief that requires proof. But then, science doesn't offer proof in support of either ignorance or prejudice.
One thing you do however demonstrate is that a given lack of intelligence is unimprovable.