Interesting to read Roger Sones political rules for his protégés. Notice how they perfectly mirror Trumps model and the GOP model. To a lesser extent we see this same routine from some of our more skilled right wing posters on this board.
“Stone’s Rules,” which include, in his own words: “Politics is not about uniting people. It’s about dividing people.” “Open multiple fronts on your enemy. He must feel confused and besieged from every side.” “Hate is a more powerful motivator than love.” “Attack, attack, attack. Never defend.” “Admit nothing, deny everything, make counter accusations.” “Those who are outraged will vote.” “You have to be outrageous to get noticed.”
That's exactly how Democrats do it.
Your lack of self awareness is obscene.
Identity politics is 100% divisive.
Hate is the bedrock of modern liberalism. You hate and dehumanize anyone who doesn't agree with you.
Democrats are the party of perpetual outrage. Your heads pop of the pillow every morning desperate to find the next thing to pretend to be outraged about.
You made my point ny attempting Stone bullet point #5. Which you do on about 95% of your postings.
Because you're really stupid let me clarify for you.
The 1993 Oklahoma City bombing was in direct response to feds' assault on Waco.
Acknowledging that there are crazy people isn't condoning their actions.
There are crazy people who are hard to stop, and there are crazy people who are pushed over the edge by circumstance. For the latter, it’s best to try to create an environment that keeps them from going over the edge.
That’s why Bernie Sanders’ anti-violence statement was very important after the congressional softball practice shooting. It’s also why it would be incredibly beneficial to America for Trump to make anti-violence statements as forcefully as Bernie did, and for him to do so multiple times, if necessary. But he doesn’t seem at all likely to be willing to do so.
( I’m the kind of person who was in favor of the BLM protesters who marched alongside police officers, who gave police officers bottles of water, and who did things like pull rioters off overturned cars and stand in front of a Target to keep looters from advancing. I considered it the appropriate administration of justice when two of BLM protesters were disbarred and prosecuted for throwing Molotov cocktails. Not a fan of those spouting “defund the police.” And so on. I am opposed to lawlessness, chaos, and violence.)
Biden went on national television and declared that anyone who supports Trump is literally an enemy of the state.
Hate is the bedrock of modern liberalism. You hate and dehumanize anyone who doesn't agree with you.
Democrats are the party of perpetual outrage. Your heads pop of the pillow every morning desperate to find the next thing to pretend to be outraged about.
You made my point ny attempting Stone bullet point #5. Which you do on about 95% of your postings.
Thanks
You're using bullet point #6 you're just not clever enough to realize it.
Good grief! Political primaries are not Federal elections. Political parties are organizations with registered members and people voted into leadership positions. Political parties have the legal right to decide how their nominee is chosen. In fact, for at least the first century of the United States, primaries didn't even exist. The leaders of various political parties met and selected who the person they wanted to run in the federal election. I don't like the fact that superdelegates used to exist as part of the the Democratic parties nomination process, however, Hillary Clinton also won way more votes than Bernie Sanders (16,914,722 to 13,206,428). It wasn't even close. The United States is actually one of the few countries in the world that even holds primaries. Political parties at the state level determine how to run and conduct the primary process, or whether to have a primary election (run by state and local governments) or a caucus, which is run by state political parties. The process of holding Federal Presidential elections are laid out in the United States Constitution, and Trump clearly broke the law in his fake electors scheme, stealing of computer equipment, forgery, filing false documents, soliciting of high ranking DOJ officials to make false statements, solicitation of Mike Pence to violate the United States Constitution to reject votes cast by elected and qualified Presidential electors. And the list goes on.
If you noticed, there is an approx icon before the 80…so yes he had 75M before he garnered 60% of the polling, he certainly has not lost support. no math adds that up for you. you are learning still
Dude, he didn't have even 75m. You can't accept reality. Amazingly delusional.
It's not appropriate but it's definitely going to be on the table. Some people won't stand for tyrannical government and some people have a different definition of tyranny than you do.
Translation - The MAG@ss/GQP crowd are delusional and out of touch with reality and operate under the 'rules for thee but not me' approach.
The current govt was legally and fairly elected and operates within the Constitution so violence towards the govt would be a form of treason and should be dealt with appropriately.
He said it was inappropriate (which is a good start) but based on the reality he has been fed and believes, he thinks that jailing Trump would reflect a tyrannical government.
He didn't condemn the violence or say whether those being violent against the government should be arrested for treason. But he didn't say they shouldn't be arrested either.
"Too much of what's happening in our country today is not normal," Biden said as he urged the American people to unite against threats to our democracy.
Translation - The MAG@ss/GQP crowd are delusional and out of touch with reality and operate under the 'rules for thee but not me' approach.
The current govt was legally and fairly elected and operates within the Constitution so violence towards the govt would be a form of treason and should be dealt with appropriately.
He said it was inappropriate (which is a good start) but based on the reality he has been fed and believes, he thinks that jailing Trump would reflect a tyrannical government.
He didn't condemn the violence or say whether those being violent against the government should be arrested for treason. But he didn't say they shouldn't be arrested either.
This is where circumstance and the environment come into play. You have liberal DAs all over the country unwilling to prosecute actual criminals who are more than happy to jump into political prosecutions to try to make a name for themselves.
Democrats riot and burn and loot through all of 2020 and people get slapped on the wrist. Meanwhile, people from 1/6 (the only right wing riot in American history) who didn't do much of anything are getting YEARS of solitary confinement without trial simply for being on the premises.
The right wants EQUAL APPLICATION OF THE LAW and the left is completely uninterested in the concept.
The cop on crowd control at the George Floyd incident got sentenced to 5 years in prison. His crime? Being a cop within 50 feet of George Floyd when he died.
A blood red background with US Marines used as props.
Can't even link the articles because the idiot moderators are triggered by an acronym.
Biden didn't say 'anyone who supports Trump'.
"Too much of what's happening in our country today is not normal," he said. "Donald Trump and the M4GA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic."
A blood red background with US Marines used as props.
Can't even link the articles because the idiot moderators are triggered by an acronym.
Biden didn't say 'anyone who supports Trump'.
"Too much of what's happening in our country today is not normal," he said. "Donald Trump and the M4GA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic."
There are 74 million people in the group he's calling a threat to the republic.
Ironic that the leader of the political party which wants to abolish the electoral college and effectively kill the republic is making this claim.
A blood red background with US Marines used as props.
Can't even link the articles because the idiot moderators are triggered by an acronym.
That's a link, but I don't see "enemy of the state" there. Am I missing something? Help me out. If you have trouble posting a link, then author, article, and site would help.
I'm aware of somebody calling someone an "enemy of the state," around that time, but I haven't seen any reputable source indicate that it was Biden doing so.
A blood red background with US Marines used as props.
Can't even link the articles because the idiot moderators are triggered by an acronym.
That's a link, but I don't see "enemy of the state" there. Am I missing something? Help me out. If you have trouble posting a link, then author, article, and site would help.
I'm aware of somebody calling someone an "enemy of the state," around that time, but I haven't seen any reputable source indicate that it was Biden doing so.
You're playing a semantic game.
Enemy of the state and direct threat to the country have the same implication.
"Donald Trump and the M@GA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic. There’s no question that the Republican Party today is dominated, driven and intimidated by Donald Trump and the M@GA Republicans. And that is a threat to this country."
That's a link, but I don't see "enemy of the state" there. Am I missing something? Help me out. If you have trouble posting a link, then author, article, and site would help.
I'm aware of somebody calling someone an "enemy of the state," around that time, but I haven't seen any reputable source indicate that it was Biden doing so.
You're playing a semantic game.
Enemy of the state and direct threat to the country have the same implication.
"Donald Trump and the M@GA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic. There’s no question that the Republican Party today is dominated, driven and intimidated by Donald Trump and the M@GA Republicans. And that is a threat to this country."
Ah. Who called whom an "enemy of the state" around that time, please?
"Donald Trump and the M@GA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic. There’s no question that the Republican Party today is dominated, driven and intimidated by Donald Trump and the M@GA Republicans. And that is a threat to this country."
Ah. Who called whom an "enemy of the state" around that time, please?
It wasn't "around that time" it was AFTER the speech.
Ah. Who called whom an "enemy of the state" around that time, please?
It wasn't "around that time" it was AFTER the speech.
Wow. You're really insistent about the details now for a guy who said Biden referred to every Trump supporter as an "enemy of the state" when it was actually Trump who called Biden an "enemy of the state."
That's a link, but I don't see "enemy of the state" there. Am I missing something? Help me out. If you have trouble posting a link, then author, article, and site would help.
I'm aware of somebody calling someone an "enemy of the state," around that time, but I haven't seen any reputable source indicate that it was Biden doing so.
You're playing a semantic game.
Enemy of the state and direct threat to the country have the same implication.
"Donald Trump and the M@GA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic. There’s no question that the Republican Party today is dominated, driven and intimidated by Donald Trump and the M@GA Republicans. And that is a threat to this country."
Quite a different message than your right wing spin you attempted. What he said there is truthful and clearly borne out by evidence. Notice he qualified it as M@ga Republicans. Not all that voted for Trump are M@ga Republicans.
Trump even has a name for all Republicans that are not M@ga. He calls them RINOs. Using your own failed logic you and Sally are also M@GA because you voted for Trump.
"Donald Trump and the M@GA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic. There’s no question that the Republican Party today is dominated, driven and intimidated by Donald Trump and the M@GA Republicans. And that is a threat to this country."
It wasn't "around that time" it was AFTER the speech.
Wow. You're really insistent about the details now for a guy who said Biden referred to every Trump supporter as an "enemy of the state" when it was actually Trump who called Biden an "enemy of the state."
Trump said it AFTER the speech which labeled any republican who voted for Trump as threat to the country in a direct response to the speech.
The mental gymnastics you have to do keep this line of argument going should embarrass you.
"Donald Trump and the M@GA Republicans represent an extremism that threatens the very foundations of our republic. There’s no question that the Republican Party today is dominated, driven and intimidated by Donald Trump and the M@GA Republicans. And that is a threat to this country."
Quite a different message than your right wing spin you attempted. What he said there is truthful and clearly borne out by evidence. Notice he qualified it as M@ga Republicans. Not all that voted for Trump are M@ga Republicans.
Trump even has a name for all Republicans that are not M@ga. He calls them RINOs. Using your own failed logic you and Sally are also M@GA because you voted for Trump.
I guess we can now refer to you as such.
Biden believes the real republicans voted for him.
