Another protestor shot by federal agents in Minnesota

joedlrty wrote:

Hazy IPA wrote:

Such a loser that you have become that you think the protests are still about immigration.

Protest all you want, murder rates are reaching historic lows due to Trump’s border enforcement and the deportation of illegal alien criminals. They’ve deported over 750 murderers. Washington DC had one murder in January. Back when Marion Barry was smokin’ crack with hookers, they averaged more than that per day. You’ll sit here and rant about these two deaths (which, while tragic, each one’s actions played a role in their own demise), but don’t lose sight of the big picture:

Link:www.axios.com/2026/01/22/murder-rate-c...

There’s a whole lot fewer people dying under Trump’s watch than under Biden’s.

Make Peace wrote:

you dont actually mean this wrote:

Either trump can take the fall or people will start shooting his minions. I suspect you prefer the latter?

The other poster said Trump ordered shootings. Why do you think the DA hasn’t filed charges against Trump?

Make Peace wrote:

you dont actually mean this wrote:

Either trump can take the fall or people will start shooting his minions. I suspect you prefer the latter?

The other poster said Trump ordered shootings. Why do you think the DA hasn’t filed charges against Trump?

fisky wrote:

Harambe wrote:

It’s actually not true that simply “feeling in mortal danger” is justification.

I was just browsing through this thread when this caught my eye and I thought I should clarify this statement. "Feeling in mortal danger" is very close to the legal definition of justified use of deadly force. It's just missing the qualifier "imminent" or something similar.

In my state, the law reads as follows, TN Code § 39-17-1322 (A) The person has a reasonable belief that there is an imminent danger of death, serious bodily injury, or grave sexual abuse. Statute, § 39‑11‑612 expands the justified use of deadly force to protect another person if the conditions of the previously cited statute apply to the situation.

Glitter Bomb Turbo wrote:

sissy men who both don't work and somehow have enough time to protest i.e.

this guy sucks wrote:

Make Peace wrote:

The other poster said Trump ordered shootings. Why do you think the DA hasn’t filed charges against Trump?

Because a state DA cant charge the president with a crime when he's acting in executive capacity.

One more way the courts have slowly eroded our rights!

nkbott wrote:

this guy sucks wrote:

Because a state DA cant charge the president with a crime when he's acting in executive capacity.

One more way the courts have slowly eroded our rights!

When was that ever a right?

fisky wrote:

Harambe wrote:

It’s actually not true that simply “feeling in mortal danger” is justification.

I was just browsing through this thread when this caught my eye and I thought I should clarify this statement. "Feeling in mortal danger" is very close to the legal definition of justified use of deadly force. It's just missing the qualifier "imminent" or something similar.

In my state, the law reads as follows, TN Code § 39-17-1322 (A) The person has a reasonable belief that there is an imminent danger of death, serious bodily injury, or grave sexual abuse. Statute, § 39‑11‑612 expands the justified use of deadly force to protect another person if the conditions of the previously cited statute apply to the situation.

Glitter Bomb Turbo wrote:

It's time to draw a line in the sand, and choose which side you are on. One side is normal law abiding Americans, and the other side is purple haired, nose ring, effeminate sissy soy boys and fat white ugly liberal women who don't shave or take showers, that often pretend to be men who are somehow more manly than the aforementioned effeminate sissy men who both don't work and somehow have enough time to protest i.e. throw bottles of urine and spit all day every day. So choose, but choose wisely.

Harambe wrote:

Glitter Bomb Turbo wrote:

It's time to draw a line in the sand, and choose which side you are on. One side is normal law abiding Americans, and the other side is purple haired, nose ring, effeminate sissy soy boys and fat white ugly liberal women who don't shave or take showers, that often pretend to be men who are somehow more manly than the aforementioned effeminate sissy men who both don't work and somehow have enough time to protest i.e. throw bottles of urine and spit all day every day. So choose, but choose wisely.

I’m on the side with 80% of American.

Harambe wrote:

You missed the key word “reasonable”

Being an untrained idiot who mag dumps when your colleague says “gun” is not “reasonable” no matter how imminently terrified you are

this guy sucks wrote:

fisky wrote:

I was just browsing through this thread when this caught my eye and I thought I should clarify this statement. "Feeling in mortal danger" is very close to the legal definition of justified use of deadly force. It's just missing the qualifier "imminent" or something similar.

In my state, the law reads as follows, TN Code § 39-17-1322 (A) The person has a reasonable belief that there is an imminent danger of death, serious bodily injury, or grave sexual abuse. Statute, § 39‑11‑612 expands the justified use of deadly force to protect another person if the conditions of the previously cited statute apply to the situation.

Yeah definitions matter.

For law enforcement though there a number of tests. Reasonable belief, proportionality etc.

this guy sucks wrote:

Make Peace wrote:

The other poster said Trump ordered shootings. Why do you think the DA hasn’t filed charges against Trump?

Because a state DA cant charge the president with a crime when he's acting in executive capacity.

One more way the courts have slowly eroded our rights!

Harambe wrote:

fisky wrote:

I was just browsing through this thread when this caught my eye and I thought I should clarify this statement. "Feeling in mortal danger" is very close to the legal definition of justified use of deadly force. It's just missing the qualifier "imminent" or something similar.

In my state, the law reads as follows, TN Code § 39-17-1322 (A) The person has a reasonable belief that there is an imminent danger of death, serious bodily injury, or grave sexual abuse. Statute, § 39‑11‑612 expands the justified use of deadly force to protect another person if the conditions of the previously cited statute apply to the situation.

You missed the key word “reasonable”

Being an untrained idiot who mag dumps when your colleague says “gun” is not “reasonable” no matter how imminently terrified you are

Honos wrote:

A person on X says he has 4000 ice agents names and their families are home while Ice are kidnapping people. We should check there paperwork at home.

This is a threat big time.

Why would Ice agents dare wear a mask? Hm... I wonder

Remember Ice agents are following federal laws. The people threatening them are criminals.