We don't need a million thread on this topic. We like one thread per topic. We merged several others into this thread including one called "Alex Pretti was a deranged lunatic." and one called "New York Times reports that Pretti attacked ICE cars 11 days before his death" and one called "LeBron James: Why hasn't he commented on the Alex Pretti killing?"
If they infringe on rights we are allowed self defense.
Amazing how people can say the most outlandish, violent things about the protestors but this simple statement of defending out rights is immediately reprimanded by the idiots here.
So besides the hispanic hate from the left, they also hate gays. Despicable.
I think ICE agents should be shot in the street when they infringe out rights regardless of what ethnicity the agents are.
ICE agents are the scum of the earth but you can’t be posting stuff like this.
There was a case just last week where a guy was posting similar stuff on his social media accounts and to forums and he was arrested and will be serving time in prison.
I think ICE agents should be shot in the street when they infringe out rights regardless of what ethnicity the agents are.
ICE agents are the scum of the earth but you can’t be posting stuff like this.
There was a case just last week where a guy was posting similar stuff on his social media accounts and to forums and he was arrested and will be serving time in prison.
How is it any different from saying that protestor "deserve to be shot for breaking the law"
ICE agents are the scum of the earth but you can’t be posting stuff like this.
There was a case just last week where a guy was posting similar stuff on his social media accounts and to forums and he was arrested and will be serving time in prison.
How is it any different from saying that protestor "deserve to be shot for breaking the law"
It’s not but some things are just better left unsaid. You better judgement. Be better.
It’s not but some things are just better left unsaid. You better judgement. Be better.
Use better judgment *
Sure, let's hold everyone to that same standard then?
As long as the multiple, registered, trolls are allowed to gloat and gleefully post about Americans murdered in the street by our government for no reason... I will merely suggest that the feds might have it coming if they continue this way. FAFO or whatever.
ICE agents are the scum of the earth but you can’t be posting stuff like this.
There was a case just last week where a guy was posting similar stuff on his social media accounts and to forums and he was arrested and will be serving time in prison.
How is it any different from saying that protestor "deserve to be shot for breaking the law"
I don’t know that “deserved” is the proper term. I think in both deaths there was a reasonable belief that they were in mortal danger. In both instances they were in the process of resisting arrest and were impeding officers in the commission of their duties. What I will say is if you are armed, you should avoid conflict, not seek it out. If you seek conflict while armed, you lose the argument of self defense.
How is it any different from saying that protestor "deserve to be shot for breaking the law"
I don’t know that “deserved” is the proper term. I think in both deaths there was a reasonable belief that they were in mortal danger. In both instances they were in the process of resisting arrest and were impeding officers in the commission of their duties. What I will say is if you are armed, you should avoid conflict, not seek it out. If you seek conflict while armed, you lose the argument of self defense.
This applies to our federal agents as well?
If they seek out conflict while armed.
Or are they allow to provoke, harass, and then murder when the people they harass don't behave exactly how they want.
How is it any different from saying that protestor "deserve to be shot for breaking the law"
I don’t know that “deserved” is the proper term. I think in both deaths there was a reasonable belief that they were in mortal danger. In both instances they were in the process of resisting arrest and were impeding officers in the commission of their duties. What I will say is if you are armed, you should avoid conflict, not seek it out. If you seek conflict while armed, you lose the argument of self defense.
I don’t know that “deserved” is the proper term. I think in both deaths there was a reasonable belief that they were in mortal danger. In both instances they were in the process of resisting arrest and were impeding officers in the commission of their duties. What I will say is if you are armed, you should avoid conflict, not seek it out. If you seek conflict while armed, you lose the argument of self defense.
How is it any different from saying that protestor "deserve to be shot for breaking the law"
I don’t know that “deserved” is the proper term. I think in both deaths there was a reasonable belief that they were in mortal danger. In both instances they were in the process of resisting arrest and were impeding officers in the commission of their duties. What I will say is if you are armed, you should avoid conflict, not seek it out. If you seek conflict while armed, you lose the argument of self defense.
In neither case were the agents in mortal danger. The agents used poor judgment and were poorly trained. The agent that committed the murder of Good shouldn’t have even been on duty as it was pretty much acknowledged that he has some PTSD stuff going on. The killings of both Good & Pretti were cold blooded murders and the agents that committed those murders should be held accountable.
Or are they allow to provoke, harass, and then murder when the people they harass don't behave exactly how they want.
If you pay attention, most of these agents ask people multiple times to stop breaking laws before having to physically intervene. I have no problem with people protesting, so long as they are doing so legally. Both Good and Pretti were committing crimes at the time of their deaths, which contributed to their deaths.
I don’t know that “deserved” is the proper term. I think in both deaths there was a reasonable belief that they were in mortal danger. In both instances they were in the process of resisting arrest and were impeding officers in the commission of their duties. What I will say is if you are armed, you should avoid conflict, not seek it out. If you seek conflict while armed, you lose the argument of self defense.
In neither case were the agents in mortal danger. The agents used poor judgment and were poorly trained. The agent that committed the murder of Good shouldn’t have even been on duty as it was pretty much acknowledged that he has some PTSD stuff going on. The killings of both Good & Pretti were cold blooded murders and the agents that committed those murders should be held accountable.
In another world where Good or Pretti are able to shoot back in defense... what would we all be thinking? Apparently it's a crime to even think of such things!
Or are they allow to provoke, harass, and then murder when the people they harass don't behave exactly how they want.
If you pay attention, most of these agents ask people multiple times to stop breaking laws before having to physically intervene. I have no problem with people protesting, so long as they are doing so legally. Both Good and Pretti were committing crimes at the time of their deaths, which contributed to their deaths.
Or are they allow to provoke, harass, and then murder when the people they harass don't behave exactly how they want.
If you pay attention, most of these agents ask people multiple times to stop breaking laws before having to physically intervene. I have no problem with people protesting, so long as they are doing so legally. Both Good and Pretti were committing crimes at the time of their deaths, which contributed to their deaths.
So committing a crime allows agents to forcibly intervene, draw weapons, and kill people regardless of what the crime is?
If you pay attention, most of these agents ask people multiple times to stop breaking laws before having to physically intervene. I have no problem with people protesting, so long as they are doing so legally. Both Good and Pretti were committing crimes at the time of their deaths, which contributed to their deaths.
Both were habitual offenders.
A well known part of American common law: if you are (suspected) of committing a previous crime federal agents can execute you.
A well known part of American common law: if you are (suspected) of committing a previous crime federal agents can execute you.
You’re obtuse to the point of being pathological. You must be a member of one of the most highly protected groups, those who are allowed to make threats, even when veiled, like say Sen Dan Goldman, wherein “average” people would find themselves in trouble. Of course you see the average person as cattle, don’t you? Not really human or equal to yourself… 🤡🥸 But those people are worthy of you egging them on, trying to force them into action via roundabout methods. 😂
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.