ToiletSnake wrote:
The GOP is a circus, and DT is the head clown. Friday he was exposed as a feckless fool devoid of leadership and respect.
You mean that Friday was kind of like Monday? And Wednesday? And Saturday and Sunday? And Tuesday and Thursday?
Has there been even a single day in that buffoon's life when he was NOT exposed as a feckless fool devoid of leadership and respect?
well wrote:
L L wrote:There are oil company loopholes that Tillerson may not approve of.
Since when does the Secretary of State have a say in tax reform legislation?
Since always. Usually, the Sec of State is a close advisor to the president. Tax policy has tremendous effect on foreign investment, which is directly in the Secretary's purview.
I don't think this Sec State has the ear of potus. He's just out in the ether.
Holy cow, trumpers, your man lost AGAIN. new lows in approval. Down to 36% per gallup and 42.1 rcp average.
We're getting down toward postcrash Bush2 levels here. You republicans sure know how to pick bad presidents. Will you all just give up and agree you aren't an actual governing party? That you really just want to object to things rather than do anything?
Republican politicians have been telling us for years now that the ACA is terrible and needs major reform. So they kill it in the poll booths in November and finally have all the control they need...and they sh!t their pants.
eric a blair wrote:
I don't think this Sec State has the ear of potus. He's just out in the ether.
I agree. He seems like a man who has only one card to play, which is threatening to resign.
But even that isn't much of a threat because he'll probably resign anyway. I don't see a man like Tillerson staying in a position where he can't get anything done.
On the other hand, as long as he thinks he can help Exxon, he'll stay.
TroLLminator wrote:
Trumpiness wrote:She lost because the truth was exposed about how dirty she and the DNC are. Note that none of the Wikileaks stuff was ever disputed. Literally zero leaks. It was all completely true. The Left complaining about "Russia" undermining democracy is hilarious because they're mad that they got caught TRYING TO UNDERMINE DEMOCRACY (deceiving the American people)!! Laughable.
And to the thickskulled up the thread a bit foolishly parroting "country over party", that's exactly why Trump was elected. Trump was elected to do just what he is doing- wreaking havoc on the media and establishment. If he gets some stuff done, that'd be cool too.
What's pathetic is that you find it funny that a foreign government might have meddled in our election process. I attribute some of Hillary's loss to the leaks, but beyond that there were consistent negative news (warranted of course) and most importantly her party's election strategy failed badly.
I'm assuming you are happy he's wreacking havoc on the media and establishment. You probably think of yourself as a loyal citizen with morals who wants to clean up our government, but think about what actually gives you satisfaction here. You like seeing disagreement, criticism of free speech, and further polarization of our political system and culture.
You are too lazy to think outside the box and like millions of Americans you probably think everything is easily solvable. Once you bother to pick up some history books and think hard to understand more than just one angle in a story you might start to have a better glimpse as to why Trump is disastrous for our country. Let me summarize it in simple terms for you, having a dumba$$, egomaniac, marbles player in the most powerful seat has never ended well for any nation. He's no Reagan, he's no Putin. Consider the US to be literally leaderless until 2020.
Re-read what you just wrote. You are attempting to blame "disagreement, criticism of free speech, and further polarization..." on Trump? Again, come out of your Liberal bubble and realize that is how the LAST president left this country. The "uniter" did nothing to unite the country. And sure, you can blame Republicans for that too. But that's why Trump voters overwhelmingly voted against the establishment Republicans. THAT is thinking outside the box.
The Dems, on the other hand, thought exactly inside the box with their candidate. Oh wait, no you didn't...well, actually...you didn't have a choice at all, as the Wikileaks exposed for us (non of which has been disputed). They were caught red-handed as the POS that they are.
He's been president for 2 months. You guys post nonsense all day, every day. And after being so wrong about the election itself despite posting all day, every day about that... don't you feel like perhaps there's a better way to spend your days than defending your loser tribe?
eric a blair wrote:
I don't think this Sec State has the ear of potus. He's just out in the ether.
Holy cow, trumpers, your man lost AGAIN. new lows in approval. Down to 36% per gallup and 42.1 rcp average.
We're getting down toward postcrash Bush2 levels here. You republicans sure know how to pick bad presidents. Will you all just give up and agree you aren't an actual governing party? That you really just want to object to things rather than do anything?
Agip-
I can't believe I have to even explain this... but you do realize the whole context of "winning" was as a country, compared to other countries, right? It wasn't Republicans "winning against the Liberals."
You guys are acting like crazed lunatics at this point. You can't even think straight.
Trumpiness wrote:
[quote]TroLLminator wrote:
[quote]Trumpiness wrote:
[quote]if you want the truth wrote:
Trump was just a pawn. Putin beat us badly. He was too sharp and Hillary too unlikeable.
Do you understand now?
[quote]I don't understand wrote:
Re-read what you just wrote. You are attempting to blame "disagreement, criticism of free speech, and further polarization..." on Trump? Again, come out of your Liberal bubble and realize that is how the LAST president left this country. The "uniter" did nothing to unite the country. And sure, you can blame Republicans for that too. But that's why Trump voters overwhelmingly voted against the establishment Republicans. THAT is thinking outside the box.
The Dems, on the other hand, thought exactly inside the box with their candidate. Oh wait, no you didn't...well, actually...you didn't have a choice at all, as the Wikileaks exposed for us (non of which has been disputed). They were caught red-handed as the POS that they are.
He's been president for 2 months. You guys post nonsense all day, every day. And after being so wrong about the election itself despite posting all day, every day about that... don't you feel like perhaps there's a better way to spend your days than defending your loser tribe?
Didn't read past the first paragraph - you though outside the box and elected anincompetent twat who spends more time golfing and spending tax payers money then even attempting to govern.
Only question left is will he avoid an impeachment long enough to fill the swamp with his cronies and family members.
'Think outside the box' - good one!
BlahBlahBlah2.0 wrote:
Trumpiness wrote:[quote]TroLLminator wrote:
[quote]Trumpiness wrote:
[quote]if you want the truth wrote:
Trump was just a pawn. Putin beat us badly. He was too sharp and Hillary too unlikeable.
Do you understand now?
[quote]I don't understand wrote:
Re-read what you just wrote. You are attempting to blame "disagreement, criticism of free speech, and further polarization..." on Trump? Again, come out of your Liberal bubble and realize that is how the LAST president left this country. The "uniter" did nothing to unite the country. And sure, you can blame Republicans for that too. But that's why Trump voters overwhelmingly voted against the establishment Republicans. THAT is thinking outside the box.
The Dems, on the other hand, thought exactly inside the box with their candidate. Oh wait, no you didn't...well, actually...you didn't have a choice at all, as the Wikileaks exposed for us (non of which has been disputed). They were caught red-handed as the POS that they are.
He's been president for 2 months. You guys post nonsense all day, every day. And after being so wrong about the election itself despite posting all day, every day about that... don't you feel like perhaps there's a better way to spend your days than defending your loser tribe?
Didn't read past the first paragraph - you though outside the box and elected anincompetent twat who spends more time golfing and spending tax payers money then even attempting to govern.
Only question left is will he avoid an impeachment long enough to fill the swamp with his cronies and family members.
'Think outside the box' - good one!
Yawn. Run along, little tribal pawn!
BlahBlahBlah2.0 wrote:
Trumpiness wrote:[quote]TroLLminator wrote:
[quote]Trumpiness wrote:
[quote]if you want the truth wrote:
Trump was just a pawn. Putin beat us badly. He was too sharp and Hillary too unlikeable.
Do you understand now?
[quote]I don't understand wrote:
Re-read what you just wrote. You are attempting to blame "disagreement, criticism of free speech, and further polarization..." on Trump? Again, come out of your Liberal bubble and realize that is how the LAST president left this country. The "uniter" did nothing to unite the country. And sure, you can blame Republicans for that too. But that's why Trump voters overwhelmingly voted against the establishment Republicans. THAT is thinking outside the box.
The Dems, on the other hand, thought exactly inside the box with their candidate. Oh wait, no you didn't...well, actually...you didn't have a choice at all, as the Wikileaks exposed for us (non of which has been disputed). They were caught red-handed as the POS that they are.
He's been president for 2 months. You guys post nonsense all day, every day. And after being so wrong about the election itself despite posting all day, every day about that... don't you feel like perhaps there's a better way to spend your days than defending your loser tribe?
Didn't read past the first paragraph - you though outside the box and elected anincompetent twat who spends more time golfing and spending tax payers money then even attempting to govern.
Only question left is will he avoid an impeachment long enough to fill the swamp with his cronies and family members.
'Think outside the box' - good one!
Translation: "No". LOL
Trumpiness wrote:
eric a blair wrote:I don't think this Sec State has the ear of potus. He's just out in the ether.
Holy cow, trumpers, your man lost AGAIN. new lows in approval. Down to 36% per gallup and 42.1 rcp average.
We're getting down toward postcrash Bush2 levels here. You republicans sure know how to pick bad presidents. Will you all just give up and agree you aren't an actual governing party? That you really just want to object to things rather than do anything?
Agip-
I can't believe I have to even explain this... but you do realize the whole context of "winning" was as a country, compared to other countries, right? It wasn't Republicans "winning against the Liberals."
You guys are acting like crazed lunatics at this point. You can't even think straight.
that's actually a fair point - you are right, that is how trump used the word.
So I'm borrowing it.
my use of the 'winning' adjective is to mock DJT's 3rd grade language and concept of success. And I don't have the energy to go look for it, but I suspect at some point he probably said he'd be super successful as president and very popular. Passing big beautiful bills, grabbing more pu^&y, you know, that sort of thing.
Trumpiness wrote:
Agip-
I can't believe I have to even explain this... but you do realize the whole context of "winning" was as a country, compared to other countries, right? It wasn't Republicans "winning against the Liberals."
You guys are acting like crazed lunatics at this point. You can't even think straight.
Yes, and no. Sure, Trump referred to "winning so much it will bore us" etc, etc, etc , and was often referring to the success he will bring America, but of course he was also always talking about how HE always won, how HE was going win the election and vanquish all his opponents, and how he always has been, and always will be, a WINNER. Now sure, some of that is not different than what many politicians running for office say, since they need to win to get the job they want, but some really seem intent on winning personally via helping their constituencies win. Trump, let's be honest, even when compared to selfish, ego driven politicians, is at the top of ladder when it comes to putting himself first and the victories of others next. And on a personal level, he is, though only over a very short term, LOSING BIG LEAGUE.
As far as the country, he and other conservatives claimed that Obamacare was the ultimate disaster for this nation. Then they had the chance to kill it, and............FAILURE. So according to right wingers, this is a personal loss for Trump, and a huge loss for country. Right? It surely ain't the non-stop "WINNING" he claimed was gonna occur.
Two and a Half Men had 12 seasons and Arrested Development only 4. Appealing to the masses isn't exactly how I would measure quality. A lot of garbage is popular.
DFF is a troll created by someone who also knows Trump is a complete moron. The over-the-top parody of a crude and clueless Trump voter is funny. He makes it very obvious and I'm surprised some people are taking him seriously, unless they are just trolling him back. They all can't be, though.
anyone else think DFF is an alter ego of a frequent poster here?
DRINK F*** FIGHT wrote:
The fact of the matter is...you libbbbbtwats can't handle the cold hard truth. ✊ðŸ¿
there is actually a study I saw showing how many liberal males are lower in testosterone. I'll have to find it, but basically they're literally turning into pu$$ies haha it's amazing probly why they're so emotional!
In order to have corporate tax reform that is revenue neutral it will have to be written in a way that raises taxes on some corporations to lower it on others.
That's basic math. There's no other way.
You can lower the rate and cut a loophole that would be revenue neutral for some but it all.
As soon as companies get a whiff of changes that will hurt them, their lobbyists will go nuts.
Good luck with that, Trump.
eric a blair wrote:
anyone else think DFF is an alter ego of a frequent poster here?
He is a very odd duck. He posts more than anyone and it's highly repetitive. Always with crude language.
He is more than a normal troll because he has done this for months everyday.
I actually think he believes we read and might be bothered by his posts. This site hasn't banned him. I think he is a relative of someone associated with letsrun. They know he is troubled so they let him stay.
2280