The most glaring thing for the boys, I think, is that Lancaster is too low. If they can tighten up their 5 a bit they have a really good team. Davidson should also be higher, We will get a better measure of St X after this weekend. Medina is listed twice!
Looking at how big their 3-5 gap is, it doesn’t sound like they are reloading this year. Or they would have been #2 this year behind Mason. Last year they almost got 2nd at state and bring Ackley and 3 other people back.
They are definitely worse at the #2 spot compared to last year, hard to say how their 3-5 measure up. But they were competitive with Mas. Jackson and Springboro so it's not crazy to see them coming in 2nd at the state meet this year. I don't think they will, I'm just saying it's possible.
The most glaring thing for the boys, I think, is that Lancaster is too low. If they can tighten up their 5 a bit they have a really good team. Davidson should also be higher, We will get a better measure of St X after this weekend. Medina is listed twice!
I think it's less about tightening up, and more about the Lanoys being able to front run. Lancaster is deep, but right now they wouldn't have anyone inside 30th at states.
Girl wise, Do teams such as Westlake, Avon, Dublin Jerome, and Shaker Hts have a shot of beating teams such as Mason and Hilliard Davidson at State? (trying to start up more girl xc in this thread)
Girl wise, Do teams such as Westlake, Avon, Dublin Jerome, and Shaker Hts have a shot of beating teams such as Mason and Hilliard Davidson at State? (trying to start up more girl xc in this thread)
Westlake girls looked very strong 1-3 at Tiffin, especially Peer (the only one in the state who can beat Clute, imo), but still got wrecked by Perrysburg, who put 7 in front of Westlake's 4th.
So I think Perrysburg thumps Davidson, who seems on par with Shaker and Westlake. Not sure about Mason... haven't seen them yet.
I think it's less about tightening up, and more about the Lanoys being able to front run. Lancaster is deep, but right now they wouldn't have anyone inside 30th at states.
So you don't think that any of the Lanoys can be top 30 at state? They were top 3 at Watkins Memorial last week.
I think it's less about tightening up, and more about the Lanoys being able to front run. Lancaster is deep, but right now they wouldn't have anyone inside 30th at states.
So you don't think that any of the Lanoys can be top 30 at state? They were top 3 at Watkins Memorial last week.
Not that I don't think they can be top 30, it definitely possible. But I don't find their watkins performance impressive, the course isn't legit anymore and they didn't beat anyone relevant, especially since Coffman didn't run Shaughnessy or Mcgraw
