Sades takes the lead at mile 78!!!
Sades takes the lead at mile 78!!!
Sandes winning, Nicols second
No Jim to be seen
Jim Walmsley is no longer in 1st!
Bon Scott wrote:
No it is down. Stuck at Forest Hill mile 62
It cannot be down if time updates are still being provided. Latest update is 5:50 pm PDT for the men; just 6 minutes ago.
UltraHack wrote:
https://d1e0pyuxwb29ot.cloudfront.net/ws100/2017/46.jpgSandes had the hat backwards. You know he is picking off Jim for the W.
What did I say about THE SANDMAN
Damage! After seeing some of the promotional videos leading up to this race I really I am hoping he can bounce back from this travesty. He thought it was in the bag. Two years running too hard in a row?
Sandes Man wrote:
Can we talk about Ryan Sandes aka Hedgie the South African with good looks?
I've never heard of him but he has a book out called Trail Blazer, is sponsored by Redbull and has won all
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4_Deserts
Yes, we can talk about him now. Didnt Jim mention him by name in the irunfar interview?
Squa!Skeeer! wrote:
Damage! After seeing some of the promotional videos leading up to this race I really I am hoping he can bounce back from this travesty. He thought it was in the bag. Two years running too hard in a row?
Watch his interview. He said he loves the heat. He said it gave him a huge advantage. The heat spares no one. That's the lesson. He should have dialed it back and given up on the time record.
If he went for the CR and not sub 14
Death March wrote:
The problem seems to be getting times from the timing points after mile 62.
I noticed that, but it still wasn't updating even 78 till just now.
Death March wrote:
The problem seems to be getting times from the timing points after mile 62.
I noticed that, but it still wasn't updating even 78 till just now, and 79.8 showed up concurrently.
How many times will this Walmsley fella blast the first half of this race and fall apart before he tries a different approach?
Squa!Skeeer! wrote:
Damage! After seeing some of the promotional videos leading up to this race I really I am hoping he can bounce back from this travesty. He thought it was in the bag. Two years running too hard in a row?
When you fly too close to the sun.
where are the live results? wrote:
Squa!Skeeer! wrote:Damage! After seeing some of the promotional videos leading up to this race I really I am hoping he can bounce back from this travesty. He thought it was in the bag. Two years running too hard in a row?
Watch his interview. He said he loves the heat. He said it gave him a huge advantage. The heat spares no one. That's the lesson. He should have dialed it back and given up on the time record.
Walmsey gave up more then 40 minutes in less than 7 miles. He has to he walking, it he hasn't bailed yet. Don't count him out to hobbyjog/walk to the finish. He did so last year, and didn't care about being passed by several, including women's champ Lickteig.
Or even if he stayed slightly faster or at CR rather than 20+ minutes faster for half the race would have been smarter.
Any updates? wrote:
Death March wrote:The problem seems to be getting times from the timing points after mile 62.
I noticed that, but it still wasn't updating even 78 till just now.
Yes, it was updating times but something caused the time points between 62 and 78 to not get uploaded.
Death March wrote:
Yes, it was updating times but something caused the time points between 62 and 78 to not get uploaded.
So you're agreeing with me, fine.
Boats are being used to cross the Rucky Chucky river. Smart move. Runner safety comes first.
