uaaa wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Nope. I was paid to write. But I understand that words are not much of a skill around here.
You were paid to write and you can't spell plus ça change? Hahahaha a mere photographer.
There are symbols my phone doesn't have - and I don't care about. But you do because irrelevancies are everything when you can't see anything else.
Armstronglivs wrote:
uaaa wrote:
When you post about Hocker and Jakob over 7000 times in a year you show what has you by the balls.
It's easy, like throwing darts at a dart board. Except it squeals. Like you do.
Keep your sexual fantasies to yourself, pedo.
uaaa wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Not attacking and not desperate. It's like brushing off a fly.
When you brush flies off 7000 times a year that means you smell of sh*t. Not surprising.
Since you're one of the flies you show what you're drawn to.
Armstronglivs wrote:
uaaa wrote:
You were paid to write and you can't spell plus ça change? Hahahaha a mere photographer.
There are symbols my phone doesn't have - and I don't care about. But you do because irrelevancies are everything when you can't see anything else.
Lame excuse. You don't even know the meaning of schadenfreude.
Armstronglivs wrote:
uaaa wrote:
When you brush flies off 7000 times a year that means you smell of sh*t. Not surprising.
Since you're one of the flies you show what you're drawn to.
Thanks for admitting you are a piece of sh*t. Good boy, drongo.
uaaa wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
It's easy, like throwing darts at a dart board. Except it squeals. Like you do.
Keep your sexual fantasies to yourself, pedo.
Now you're entering the realm of projection.You are probably in the Epstein files.
uaaa wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Since you're one of the flies you show what you're drawn to.
Thanks for admitting you are a piece of sh*t. Good boy, drongo.
Too dumb to realize your own-goal. As one of the flies, you clearly have an appetite for sh*t.
uaaa wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
There are symbols my phone doesn't have - and I don't care about. But you do because irrelevancies are everything when you can't see anything else.
Lame excuse. You don't even know the meaning of schadenfreude.
There's that buzzing noise again.
None of these losers has anything to say on the thread topic; they are too obsessed with another poster.
Armstronglivs wrote:
uaaa wrote:
Thanks for admitting you are a piece of sh*t. Good boy, drongo.
Too dumb to realize your own-goal. As one of the flies, you clearly have an appetite for sh*t.
Too dumb to realize your own-goal. I'd rather be a fly than a piece of sh*t, like you.
Armstronglivs wrote:
uaaa wrote:
Lame excuse. You don't even know the meaning of schadenfreude.
There's that buzzing noise again.
Being a piece of sh*t you must be used to it.
Armstronglivs wrote:
None of these losers has anything to say on the thread topic; they are too obsessed with another poster.
NPD ☝
Armstronglivs wrote:
human performance wrote:
Yeah, Livs is obviously upset. That’s why he keeps bumping this thread even though he’s already been soundly defeated. It’s bothering him so much he can’t stop thinking about it!
Rough few days for Livs. He got absolutely eviscerated in both this thread and the one about the US in the 1950s. It’s been fun to see, but I don’t know how he comes back. Any normal person would feel too embarrassed to come back here after that. It’s like he’s a glutton for self-embarrassment.
When you go on and on about a commenter instead of the thread topic you show what has you by the balls.
Wrong. It just shows I’m entertained by clowns. But at least clowns get paid. You make a fool out of yourself for free. Pathetic!
Armstronglivs wrote:
None of these losers has anything to say on the thread topic; they are too obsessed with another poster.
A poster
- who never just admits when being wrong (what he regularly is)
- who posts the same nonsense sometimes hundreds of times
- who never adds some useful information to some thread
- who regularly goes into personal attacks when proved to be wrong again
- who often misses any logic to get to his conclusions
- who can't get the most easy facts correct
- who just recently - after 6 decades of following the sport - was not able to write running times in the correct format
Armstronglivs wrote:
None of these losers has anything to say on the thread topic; they are too obsessed with another poster.
This thread is supposed to be about who Jakob views as his rival. You derailed it with your attacks on Hocker, just like you've derailed so many other threads. You are the last person who should be complaining about staying on topic.
uaaa wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
None of these losers has anything to say on the thread topic; they are too obsessed with another poster.
NPD ☝
And here is one of them.
Go Hocker wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
None of these losers has anything to say on the thread topic; they are too obsessed with another poster.
This thread is supposed to be about who Jakob views as his rival. You derailed it with your attacks on Hocker, just like you've derailed so many other threads. You are the last person who should be complaining about staying on topic.
If you read the thread title you will see that Hocker is included in the subject. It was too long a sentence for you?
aaau wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
None of these losers has anything to say on the thread topic; they are too obsessed with another poster.
A poster
- who never just admits when being wrong (what he regularly is)
- who posts the same nonsense sometimes hundreds of times
- who never adds some useful information to some thread
- who regularly goes into personal attacks when proved to be wrong again
- who often misses any logic to get to his conclusions
- who can't get the most easy facts correct
- who just recently - after 6 decades of following the sport - was not able to write running times in the correct format
Yet another obsessed with another poster. Nothing on the thread topic of course.
human performance wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
When you go on and on about a commenter instead of the thread topic you show what has you by the balls.
Wrong. It just shows I’m entertained by clowns. But at least clowns get paid. You make a fool out of yourself for free. Pathetic!
Nah, you're just another who gets wound up by reading opinions you can't cope with. You have nothing to offer on the thread topic.
uaaa wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Too dumb to realize your own-goal. As one of the flies, you clearly have an appetite for sh*t.
Too dumb to realize your own-goal. I'd rather be a fly than a piece of sh*t, like you.
If you'd rather be a fly then you obviously like sh*t.