Armstronglivs wrote:
You can't connect the features of the argument. An acknowledgement by CAS of what was "possible" does not rebut the presumption of intent on the grounds of probability - it was improbable in other words; if it was "likely" it may have. You see, words do mean what we think they mean.
It's amusing when you tell yourself the problem must be others not understanding your dumbed-down explanations.
As I said, I understand what "possible but unlikely" means. I only ever say "possible" in response to claims of "not possible" or "ruled out the possibility".