It's a blog (even says "The Blog") at the top. One dumb woman, not "According to the Huffington Post"
It's a blog (even says "The Blog") at the top. One dumb woman, not "According to the Huffington Post"
If she is so concerned about comments regarding her size in relation to being pregnant then why did she accompany her blog post with a picture of her and her friends showing off how big they have gotten?
Huffington Post is for democrats/fairies.
Can you ask them if they know who the Father is?
Can you ask her is she's married?
Pregisimo wrote:
I've always known Huffington Post to be over-the-top PC/feminist
And now here you are, on a running site of all places, pissing and moaning about an over-the-top PC column.
What next? You going to complain that "Ebony" and BET don't feature enough white people? Or that "Penthouse" only has pics of naked thin women and needs more fat hairy guys?
Obviously you're the kind of moron who goes looking for trouble when it hasn't alreeady found you. Me? I won't follow links to that stupid site for the simple reason that it takes over a minute to load on my very fast system/connection, so choked it is with even shittier ads than this place serves up. Its hyper-liberal PC content is a minor annoyance compared to that.
Oh my God! One woman expresses an opinion and you form a lynch mob.
Randy Oldman wrote:
Oh my God! One woman expresses an opinion and you form a lynch mob.
This is typical of the readership of Letsrun -- poorly educated, hysterical, and anti-female-interest in both obvious and subtle ways. The original poster is most likely impotent and obviously would be well advised to never impregnate someone even if he could perform, yet he's unduly concerned with a feminist article in a liberal media outlet. Looks like someone has a problem and it ain't the chick who penned the column.
MEN'S RIGHTS ACTAVISTS RULE! wrote:
Randy Oldman wrote:Oh my God! One woman expresses an opinion and you form a lynch mob.
This is typical of the readership of Letsrun -- poorly educated, hysterical, and anti-female-interest in both obvious and subtle ways. The original poster is most likely impotent and obviously would be well advised to never impregnate someone even if he could perform, yet he's unduly concerned with a feminist article in a liberal media outlet. Looks like someone has a problem and it ain't the chick who penned the column.
How can you be hysterical and anti-female, isn't the definition of hysterical being pro-female?
5/10 at least wrote:
isn't the definition of hysterical being pro-female?
\
No. Maybe it is in the teabagger dictionary, but in standard English it means something altogther different.
I don't think it's sexist to ask that question, but it can be kinda risky and uncomfortable. Example: There is a woman who goes to my gym, probably in her early 40s. Someone asked her one day when she was due and she said "Oh, I'm not pregnant. This is my tumor. I have terminal colon cancer." It was awkward just to watch! So, it's best to not even ask.
Arianna Puffington wrote:
Pregisimo wrote:I've always known Huffington Post to be over-the-top PC/feminist
And now here you are, on a running site of all places, pissing and moaning about an over-the-top PC column.
What next? You going to complain that "Ebony" and BET don't feature enough white people? Or that "Penthouse" only has pics of naked thin women and needs more fat hairy guys?
Obviously you're the kind of moron who goes looking for trouble when it hasn't alreeady found you. Me? I won't follow links to that stupid site for the simple reason that it takes over a minute to load on my very fast system/connection, so choked it is with even shittier ads than this place serves up. Its hyper-liberal PC content is a minor annoyance compared to that.
hahahahahahahahahahaha
Hormones makin me crazy wrote:
Of course it's sexist. You would never ask a man when he's due!
lol
literally zeros references to sexism in this article.