Mitt the Plumber wrote:
Or do you want to be reading about all kinds of absurd conspiracist bullshit on page 3? UFO sightings, Holocaust denial, astronomy, creationism, 9-11 conspiracy theory, fake Moon landings, trickle-down economics, etc. Then read the National Enquirer. Or watch Fox News.
I love how everyone talks about Fox News, while pretending that MSNBC, CNN, ABC, etc... aren't just as bad, only in the other direction...
Now who's pretending?
FloppyRunner wrote:
Mitt the Plumber wrote:Or do you want to be reading about all kinds of absurd conspiracist bullshit on page 3? UFO sightings, Holocaust denial, astronomy, creationism, 9-11 conspiracy theory, fake Moon landings, trickle-down economics, etc. Then read the National Enquirer. Or watch Fox News.
I love how everyone talks about Fox News, while pretending that MSNBC, CNN, ABC, etc... aren't just as bad, only in the other direction...
I've never seen a climate change segment on CNN or ABC that didn't include some interview with a denier. Those stations certainly lean left (if that's where science lives these days), but they're not nearly as far from center as Fox.
I used to date a woman who was a writer for the LA Times. She was a hardcore Democrat and wildly anti anything republican. I got the sense everyone else at the LA Times was the same as her. Which is fine, except the paper should just come out and say what it is, ala Fox and MSNBC, and make no pretense of doing objective reporting. But the Times instead prints left-wing editorial pieces in the regular news section as if it is "reporting news."
Facts are anti-Republican.
Mitt the Plumber wrote:
Facts are anti-Republican.
You sound like a real winner Mitt. LOL! Loser alert!
zbt wrote:
I used to date a woman who was a writer for the LA Times. She was a hardcore Democrat and wildly anti anything republican. I got the sense everyone else at the LA Times was the same as her. Which is fine, except the paper should just come out and say what it is, ala Fox and MSNBC, and make no pretense of doing objective reporting. But the Times instead prints left-wing editorial pieces in the regular news section as if it is "reporting news."
Science has no political affiliation. Now, the anti-science crowd certainly does, but science, well now, that's a horse of a different color. See Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District.
RobertELee wrote:
zbt wrote:I used to date a woman who was a writer for the LA Times. She was a hardcore Democrat and wildly anti anything republican. I got the sense everyone else at the LA Times was the same as her. Which is fine, except the paper should just come out and say what it is, ala Fox and MSNBC, and make no pretense of doing objective reporting. But the Times instead prints left-wing editorial pieces in the regular news section as if it is "reporting news."
Science has no political affiliation. Now, the anti-science crowd certainly does, but science, well now, that's a horse of a different color. See Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District.
Science may have no political affiliation but the pseudo-science nutcases (i.e., global warming frauds) certainly flock to the Democratic Party or the Socialist Party.
Nor will they publish op-eds from flat earthers.
Pippi Longstockings wrote:
RobertELee wrote:Science has no political affiliation. Now, the anti-science crowd certainly does, but science, well now, that's a horse of a different color. See Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District.
Science may have no political affiliation but the pseudo-science nutcases (i.e., global warming frauds) certainly flock to the Democratic Party or the Socialist Party.
Yes, but Jesus, Benghazi, Kenyan world view, Go Whitey! Gravity is just a theory, Young Earth Creationists, Ted Cruz, Hillary killed that guy, Nathan Bedford Forrest, and every other damned American thing!
JohnBirch wrote:
Gravity is just a theory,
I believe in Intelligent Falling.
Like the Obama Administration!
Pippi Longstockings wrote:
RobertELee wrote:Science has no political affiliation. Now, the anti-science crowd certainly does, but science, well now, that's a horse of a different color. See Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District.
Science may have no political affiliation but the pseudo-science nutcases (i.e., global warming frauds) certainly flock to the Democratic Party or the Socialist Party.
Valid points Pippi. I wonder how many acting jobs an actor could get if he or she came out admitting Global Warming was a hoax. Most know it is but have to pretend it is happening, just as do Climate "Scientists." It is beyond absurd and laughable now.
Psst - actors are not conducting climate research.
jjjjjjjj wrote:
Nor will they publish op-eds from flat earthers.
Nor Holocaust deniers. Boy, talk about biased, huh?