kozz wrote:
The rabbit wins in 13:20
Farah 2nd in 13:31.24, Gebremeskel 3rd, also in 13:31.24.
yep, the rabbit gets to 4k in 10:15
the field lounges through in 10:40-10:45
rabbit goes to step off, looks around. says, what the heck.
he's fading, but gets to the bell in 11:50.
jogs in with a 1:30 last 400.
Thomas Wastolife wrote:
that's an absurd argument. to say farah winning 10k gold was almost letting levins be a factor is like saying christian smith winning the indoor mile a few years ago is almost letting stephen pfeiffer be a factor. or like saying any other very talented runner winning a sit and kick race is giving a less talented runner a chance to be factor. just because the pack is bigger with a lap to go in a slow race DOES NOT mean it's equal.
That's not absurd.
You think that running a slow race does NOT allow more people to be a factor in the end? You REALLY think that?
And I didn't say it was equal. I said ALMOST. Levins ran 27:30 this year with like a 54 last lap didn't he? That's not the far off of how the Olympic 10k went. Therefore he was almost a factor.