Quincey - Greatest 400 ever

You might be the dumbest son of a bitch I've ever encountered. OK, since you can't get your thick head around my question, suppose Bekele runs a semifinal in 26:55. Is that better than winning a final in 26:35? The fact that it is a semifinal means nothing. You might be the most recalcitrant of the cognitively challenged posters who are so ubiquitous here.

jennifer cruz wrote:

...who am I going to believe, myself or a moron?

The person who hurls insults first, is the one who has nothing to say. The argument has been lost so the person results to childish behavior.

The person you should believe is yourself, the one who is also the "moron." You answered your own question. You have the loop on yourself.

moron

it all depends on the manner of the 26'55 & of the 26'35

if he ran 1st 1/2 in 12'55 & 2nd half in 14'00, it sure is superior to a 26'35 if that is run evenly all the way round

are you such a stoopid moron that you can't even understand basic quality considerations ???

now f*** off & call your kindergarden teacher for your remedial classes

Psycho Logical wrote:

jennifer cruz wrote:

...who am I going to believe, myself or a moron?

The person who hurls insults first, is the one who has nothing to say. The argument has been lost so the person results to childish behavior.

The person you should believe is yourself, the one who is also the "moron." You answered your own question. You have the loop on yourself.

Get back to your job writing nonsense to slip into fortune cookies...you make no sense...and perhaps very little cents...

ventolin^3 wrote:

moron

it all depends on the manner of the 26'55 & of the 26'35

if he ran 1st 1/2 in 12'55 & 2nd half in 14'00, it sure is superior to a 26'35 if that is run evenly all the way round

are you such a stoopid moron that you can't even understand basic quality considerations ???

now f*** off & call your kindergarden teacher for your remedial classes

You're the dumbest of the dumb. ASSume all things being equal, you are ASSerting that a slower qualifying effort is superior to a faster final. This makes no sense. You make many nonsensical ASSumptions.

jennifer cruz wrote:You're the dumbest of the dumb. ASSume all things being equal, you are ASSerting that a slower qualifying effort is superior to a faster final

imbecile

if you cannot see this, you must be the stoopidest f*** to ever "grace" these boards

watch these & learn something moron :

The only thing I learned is that you cannot understand what you read and that you cannot think in a logical manner. Happy Thanksgiving darling.

That's our Ventolin: An imbecile, wearing soiled diapers, begging his retarded mother to change them for him.

no

it's piss-ant imbeciles like yourself who haven't got a clue about the sport trolling up good threads

f*** off & go back to poking under rocks with a stick for your daily sustenance

ventolin^3 wrote:

no

it's piss-ant imbeciles like yourself who haven't got a clue about the sport trolling up good threads

f*** off & go back to poking under rocks with a stick for your daily sustenance

But Eldrick--you're sooooo profoundly retarded and OBVIOUSLY mentally ill, and almost EVERYTHING you say about track is complete bullshit. So it's MUCH more fun to point out what a total loser you are. Do you like being a loser? Can you even feed yourself?

who are you talking to, retard ?

obviously it appears that someone let all the morons out for the holiday

makes one contemplate that the eugenics movement shoud revived...

Darling, if Bekele were to run a qualifying round by going out in 13:15 and coming back in 13:35 for a 26:50, easing up and clearly not at his limit, you would call it the greatest 10,000 ever run, and you'd be wrong. If you cannot see the analogy here, darling, then you'd best not play on this field, and go back to your sandbox.

moron

depends upon exactly how much easing up & far from his limit he was - there is little doubt his 26'49 in '03 with <13'00 last 1/2 was wr calibre & wr was 26'22

learn something idiot

go watch boutayeb's 27'21

if he'd run that in a paced race on a temperate day & hard to the end, he wouda smashed the 27'13wr & possibly got close to 27-flat

you clearly don't have a clue about the sport

ventolin^3 wrote:

moron

depends upon exactly how much easing up & far from his limit he was

Sweetie, what I gather from your statement is that if Bekele was looking so easy that he probably could have run 26:20 by himself, but that because it was a qualifying round he "jogged" a 26:50, that you would call it the greatest 10,000 ever. But darling, what you're too thick to grasp is that unused ability is not tantamount to manifestation of the greatest...Pumpkin, perhaps you need to learn what words mean. It might show the greatest potential, but it is not the greatest. Can you grasp this, my dear child?

ventolin^3 wrote:

who are you talking to, retard ?

obviously it appears that someone let all the morons out for the holiday

makes one contemplate that the eugenics movement shoud revived...

Eugenics would RID the world of people like you. You apparently don't understand this plain, irrefutable fact.

jennifer cruz wrote:Sweetie, what I gather from your statement is that if Bekele was looking so easy that he probably could have run 26:20 by himself

imbecile

for umpteenth time

NO ONE can run 26'20 solo

get it into your numbskull

even the 26'17 wr woudn't be better than 26'30 SOLO

but that because it was a qualifying round he "jogged" a 26:50, that you would call it the greatest 10,000 ever

drivel

read the context of "easy"

But darling, what you're too thick to grasp is that unused ability is not tantamount to manifestation of the greatest...

moron

did you watch boutayeb's 27'21 ???

watch it & think again idiot

Pumpkin, perhaps you need to learn what words mean. It might show the greatest potential, but it is not the greatest. Can you grasp this, my dear child?

moron

did you see marsh's 19.73 or boutayeb ??

get your remedial class & come back here then imbecile

An Historian wrote:

Here you go:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uDycCUeZ0BA&feature=related

. 42.9 seconds - the fastest a human being has ever run around a 400 meter track. When Johnson took the baton he might as well have been the only person on the track.

Your post kinda makes it sound like Reynolds (who handed off to Johnson) ran the 42.9. It was actually Johnson who did that.

Reynolds ran "only" 43.3. Slacker

I still don't see how people continue to claim times aren't possible when they've been accomplished already.

You don't need a rabbit to run this time or that.

You also need to run faster for it to be a better effort, you are not the athlete and have no idea how much "effort" was put into either run.

anal snack food wrote:

But Eldrick--you're sooooo profoundly retarded and OBVIOUSLY mentally ill, and almost EVERYTHING you say about track is complete bullshit. So it's MUCH more fun to point out what a total loser you are. Do you like being a loser? Can you even feed yourself?

I didn't realize this nitwit was Eldrick.

That explains eveything.