You think 21.3x for the 200 - which hasn't been touched in 35 years - is legit? 35 years before she set that record the world mark was 23.4. But no progress since 1988.
Never said that, nor implied it. Like most, I believe she was doped "to the gills" that magical year where she set all of those ridiculous records. My response was intended to be a troll post, sort playing on the speculation that her 100m time was done with a heavy tailwind but it was never registered because of a faulty wind gauge. Why the hell am I explaining this?
You think 21.3x for the 200 - which hasn't been touched in 35 years - is legit? 35 years before she set that record the world mark was 23.4. But no progress since 1988.
Never said that, nor implied it. Like most, I believe she was doped "to the gills" that magical year where she set all of those ridiculous records. My response was intended to be a troll post, sort playing on the speculation that her 100m time was done with a heavy tailwind but it was never registered because of a faulty wind gauge. Why the hell am I explaining this?
Because you don't know Armstrong very well? He will not understand, even when you explain 10 times.
Never said that, nor implied it. Like most, I believe she was doped "to the gills" that magical year where she set all of those ridiculous records. My response was intended to be a troll post, sort playing on the speculation that her 100m time was done with a heavy tailwind but it was never registered because of a faulty wind gauge. Why the hell am I explaining this?
Because you don't know Armstrong very well? He will not understand, even when you explain 10 times.
And you will always explain 10 times, since you don't know how to get it right the first or any subsequent time.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.