There's always a whole lot of perfectly "normal" reasons for stand-out performances that have made observers wonder how they did it. But it's never the most obvious reason in yet another totally dirty sport.
So why do you think she started doping a few months back? Why wasn't she doping when she was a 159 runner or a 67:30?
You'll have to ask her. But getting better results is quite an incentive. It's what drives most.
So why do you think she started doping a few months back? Why wasn't she doping when she was a 159 runner or a 67:30?
You'll have to ask her. But getting better results is quite an incentive. It's what drives most.
Sure so why didn't she dope when she ran 230+ or 6830? Why did she decide in the middle of summer to start doping? And if she was doping while running 6830, what magic new drug is slicing 4 mins off your HM time...
Why didn't she dope from 16? Or 18? Runners don't automatically dope (if they do), it is choice they make. There can be a bunch of reasons why they might make that choice. But the question you might ask yourself is: are improvements of the rate and magnitude some athletes make best explained by legitimate reasons or by their doping? Color me cynical, but when doping is such a pervasive feature in sport today it is easy to believe the latter.
Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win a LetsRun t-shirt.Help us build the best running shoe review site for a chance to win one of 10 LetsRun t-shirts.