Providing your shoe size lets us help you find the best shoes you can buy right now.
10 |
29%
|
9 |
29%
|
8 |
43%
|
7 |
0%
|
6 |
0%
|
≤ 5 |
0%
|
10 |
29%
|
9 |
29%
|
8 |
43%
|
7 |
0%
|
6 |
0%
|
≤ 5 |
0%
|
10 |
57%
|
9 |
29%
|
8 |
0%
|
7 |
14%
|
6 |
0%
|
≤ 5 |
0%
|
10 |
43%
|
9 |
14%
|
8 |
43%
|
7 |
0%
|
6 |
0%
|
≤ 5 |
0%
|
10 |
14%
|
9 |
29%
|
8 |
29%
|
7 |
14%
|
6 |
14%
|
≤ 5 |
0%
|
10 |
14%
|
9 |
29%
|
8 |
14%
|
7 |
29%
|
6 |
14%
|
≤ 5 |
0%
|
10 |
14%
|
9 |
29%
|
8 |
43%
|
7 |
14%
|
6 |
0%
|
≤ 5 |
0%
|
While this may not be the fastest shoe for the price, cushioning and comfort it wirks great for tempo runs or just long slow runs
I really like the wide toe box coupled with a snug fitting heel. The cushioning is very good, but could be better for large runners. (I'm over 200 lbs) The shoe has held up very well, and looks good, too.
Great quality for value (160e)
I have used all three versions and did not like Version 1, no real cushion and felt clunky. Then when #2 came out I found I liked it for all my runs and it had a great fit for my low volume foot and still with a great amount of room in the toe box. So when #3 came out I was not sure what to expect as so many shoes were coming out wider but #3 kept the low volume so mid-foot locks in and great toe room. All that and cushioning was better than #2. May not be the lightest shoe or fastest but have fund is a great everyday show for all my runs.