Marius Bakken Training Talk Live Now
Watch on Youtube

2025 NCAA cross country championships projected men’s qualifiers

The NCAA held its regional meets for the 2025 NCAA cross country championships on Friday. Thanks to sites like CollegeXC and XC Quals, we are able to project the full 32-team NCAA field based on the NCAA’s at-large qualifying formula. Below are the projections (and logic) for the men’s field at the 2025 NCAA cross country championships, which will be held on November 22 in Columbia, Mo. These projections were generated by CollegeXC.

Team Method of qualification Gives points to
1 Notre Dame Automatic qualification
(#1 Great Lakes)
Colorado, Michigan State, Northern Arizona, Virginia, Washington St., Wisconsin
2 Butler Automatic qualification
(#2 Great Lakes)
Colorado (2), Michigan State, Northern Arizona, Virginia, Washington St.
3 Princeton Automatic qualification
(#1 Mid-Atlantic)
Colorado, Michigan State, Missouri, Northern Arizona, Virginia
4 Georgetown Automatic qualification
(#2 Mid-Atlantic)
Colorado, Harvard, Michigan, Michigan State, North Carolina, Northern Arizona, Stanford, Washington St., Wisconsin
5 Oklahoma State Automatic qualification
(#1 Midwest)
No losses to unselected teams
6 Iowa State Automatic qualification
(#2 Midwest)
No losses to unselected teams
7 New Mexico Automatic qualification
(#1 Mountain)
No losses to unselected teams
8 BYU Automatic qualification
(#2 Mountain)
Colorado (3), Northern Arizona, Virginia
9 Syracuse Automatic qualification
(#1 Northeast)
Colorado (2), Virginia (2)
10 Iona Automatic qualification
(#2 Northeast)
Air Force, Colorado (2), Florida, Furman, Gonzaga (2), Harvard, Lipscomb (2), Louisville, Michigan (2), Michigan State (2), Missouri, North Carolina, Northern Arizona (2), Stanford (2), Utah State, Virginia, Washington St. (2), Wisconsin
11 Alabama Automatic qualification
(#1 South)
Colorado, Virginia
12 Ole Miss Automatic qualification
(#2 South)
Air Force, Colorado, Georgia (2), Kentucky, Lipscomb, Michigan, Michigan State, Missouri (3), Northern Arizona, Oklahoma, Stanford, Tennessee, Texas, Texas A&M, Virginia, Washington St.
13 Tulane Automatic qualification
(#1 South Central)
Colorado (2), Michigan State (2), Northern Arizona (2), Tulsa, Virginia, Washington St., Wisconsin
14 Arkansas Automatic qualification
(#2 South Central)
Georgia (2), Loyola (Ill.), Minnesota, Missouri, Oklahoma, Texas, Wichita State
15 Wake Forest Automatic qualification
(#1 Southeast)
Colorado, Northern Arizona, Virginia (3), Virginia Tech
16 Eastern Kentucky Automatic qualification
(#2 Southeast)
Air Force, Colorado (2), Gonzaga, Harvard, Louisville, Michigan, Michigan State (2), Missouri, North Carolina, Northern Arizona (2), Stanford (2), Virginia, Washington St. (2), Wisconsin
17 Oregon Automatic qualification
(#1 West)
No losses to unselected teams
18 CBU Automatic qualification
(#2 West)
Colorado, Michigan State, Northern Arizona, Washington St., Wisconsin
19 Virginia (#3 Southeast) – 14 points (tiebreak) No losses to unselected teams
20 Northern Arizona (#3 Mountain) – 14 points Colorado (2)
21 Colorado (#4 Mountain) – 22 points No losses to unselected teams
22 Washington St. (#3 West) – 10 points Michigan State, Missouri, Stanford
23 Wisconsin (#3 Great Lakes) – 6 points Michigan State (2)
24 Michigan State (#4 Great Lakes) – 15 points No losses to unselected teams
25 Michigan (#5 Great Lakes) – 5 points Air Force, Harvard, Missouri, North Carolina, Stanford
26 Georgia (#3 South) – 4 points (tiebreak) No losses to unselected teams
27 Air Force (#5 Mountain) – 4 points (tiebreak) Boise State, Missouri, Stanford
28 Harvard (#3 Northeast) – 4 points (tiebreak) Texas A&M, Utah State
29 Virginia Tech (#4 Southeast) – Pushed in by North Carolina – 1 points [Pushed in: no points conceded]
30 North Carolina (#5 Southeast) – 4 points Cal Poly, Louisville, Loyola (Ill.), Minnesota
31 Louisville (#6 Southeast) – 3 points (tiebreak) Gonzaga, Loyola (Ill.), Minnesota, Stanford (2)
32 Oklahoma (#3 Midwest) – 2 points (tiebreak) Tulsa

You can find the women’s projected teams here.

Want a breakdown of the NCAA regional action? See this: LRC 2025 NCAA XC regional analysis: Jane Hedengren is the NCAA favorite, Stanford men’s 31-year NCAA streak ends

You can discuss all of Friday’s regional action on the LRC messageboard

MB Official 2025 NCAA XC Regional live discussion thread + Live NCAA big dance announcement show at 2 pm ET