Former cyclist here.
Please, please do not use conversions. Lots of people say like 1 min running = 3 min cycling or something and you should do 3x the volume now. This concept is flawed in many aspects.
1) Yes, cyclists ride a lot. But their event demands are vastly different from runners. Races often take 3, 4, 5 or more hours. So they need to have such long rides and train a lot to prepare their body for it. If you train for 5k or 10k, your race duration is 14 min-35 min or something. Completely different.
2) You are not used to cycling. If you go out and start riding 3 hours, your muscles will be extremely sore and you will cause fatigue that might linger. Your legs will burn and feel weak even at low HRs. It happened to me many times.
3) If you start overdoing it, say bike 3 hours for 3 days in a row each day, your butt will be so sore that you will regret it. Again, you and your muscles are not used to that activity.
Imagine Chris Froome, one of the best cyclists in the world. He gets injured with biking. Say he bikes 30 hours a week. Would you have him run 10 hours a week? No. Would you have him run 100 mpw? (he bikes 300 mpw) - NO! Even if he would run on an anti-gravity treadmill with no impact, he would be fried by 100 mpw of running.
Think about - WHAT DO YOU WANT TO ACHIEVE WITH CROSS-TRAINING? Do you want to become a great cyclist? If yes, then keep building your volume and change your sports. But if you want to just stay in shape for running, and keep your fitness up, train MODERATELY. If you ran 1 hour a day, then bike for 1 hour a day, but not more.
Then, you can slowly start building volume as you get more used to it. But don't go nuts. If you do too much cycling, you get quads that are way too big/strong for an efficient running stride, I'm still dealing with this because I biked a decent amount in the past.