Totally untrue. There are certain regulated professions where you cannot publicly claim to be something you aren’t, usually revolving around educational and licensing requirements.
Totally untrue. There are certain regulated professions where you cannot publicly claim to be something you aren’t, usually revolving around educational and licensing requirements.
sbeefyk2 wrote:
I mean you can call yourself anything. I know high school dropouts who took up careers in insurance sales and they have "Economist" on their business card even though they couldn't tell you the difference between output and inflation.
This is not so in psychology.
The term "psychology" and the title "Psychologist" are legally protected terms. Meaning that only a person who has taken specific coursework, hours and completed licensure requirements can legally use these terms.
Doing so and NOT having done the requirements is not only ethically wrong as using it conveys expertise to the client. This is exactly what happened with NOP, it's may also be against the law.
What was your experience with Rojo introducing you to certified MDs, certified nutritionists and certified psychologists?
Wouldn't it be great if you had to have a sports journalism license? Can you imagine if either Wejo or Rojo had to pass the license exam?
That would be a laugh, wouldn't it.
Licensing wrote:
Wouldn't it be great if you had to have a sports journalism license? Can you imagine if either Wejo or Rojo had to pass the license exam?
Doos it have a speeling sekshun you wood also have to past?
You have to wonder what happened in May 2018...