The results say wrote:
I'll hold back wrote:
Show us the data or link to studies.
My mistake. Altitude has no effect on aerobic or anaerobic capacity. You happy now?
Exactly, we knew you were full of s#it.
The results say wrote:
I'll hold back wrote:
Show us the data or link to studies.
My mistake. Altitude has no effect on aerobic or anaerobic capacity. You happy now?
Exactly, we knew you were full of s#it.
100m wrote:
How is it possible that every single letsrun thread ends with with petty back-and-forth insults like this?
"How is it possible"? That's the purpose of this website. The raison d'être.
Why do you not know this?
Decision maker wrote:
Take your blinders off. It depends on cost. All of these top recruits can't be full rides at Stanford. So if a kid could go to CU for free or Stanford for $150k, I would recommend CU. If both are free, then Stanford wins. It is like saying you shoul d buy the BMW for $100k over the Chevrolet for $25k. Yes the BMW is better but may not be a better deal.
Perhaps a better deal in the moment, but not necessarily a better deal over time. Degrees from Stanford and Colorado are not equal and do not have the same return on investment when evaluated over time. A Stanford degree most likely will provide a 1.x multiplier in salary per year when compared to a Colorado degree, which over time may negate the difference in sticker price. A Stanford degree will make it easier to get into a better graduate program in law or business, if that is a route to be taken, which has the potential to open up career opportunities and earning potentials that a Colorado degree will not.
I like the Colorado program much more than the Stanford program, and it would be cool to see what Sprout could do at Colorado under Wetmore and in that environment, but anyone with the option should be very hesitant to turn down a Stanford (or Princeton for that matter) opportunity for Colorado (or NAU and Oregon as well).