just my opinion wrote:
New theory - the anti-NOP anonymous letsrun posters are pro athletes. The rest of us are fine with ethical grey area coaching.
The verdict actually makes me like Salazar better. He was trying to help his athletes in any way he could within the rules. He made mistakes, but his mistakes did not directly affect any athlete and he was only trying to protect them (like trying to make sure Galen couldn't be sabotaged). He was not the intentional, undercover rule-breaker like some letsrun posters insinuate.
NotaFan wrote:
He's been dirty and crapping all over the sport...
just my opinion wrote:
The verdict actually makes me like Salazar better.
Same here ` wrote:
The whole thing from the start has made me much more supportive of Salazar.
He used to share many of the NOP's workouts, and then stopped doing that because of the constant attacks.
Not surprisingly, several of the athlete's negative reactions are from Wetmore's group, who've been active in the process.
adsfsdfad wrote:
They all hate Nike for various reason. When the pregnancy thing came out...the usual suspects all piled on Nike (while NB, Saucony, Brooks quietly updated their contracts) No one attacked Asics for their policies.
It's tiresome.
Almost not one of them read the actual decision, they just went based on the headline.
Pro runners are a collective bunch of morons.
just my opinion wrote:
New theory - the anti-NOP anonymous letsrun posters are pro athletes. The rest of us are fine with ethical grey area coaching.
just my opinion wrote:
New theory - the anti-NOP anonymous letsrun posters are pro athletes. The rest of us are fine with ethical grey area coaching.
The verdict actually makes me like Salazar better. He was trying to help his athletes in any way he could within the rules. He made mistakes, but his mistakes did not directly affect any athlete and he was only trying to protect them (like trying to make sure Galen couldn't be sabotaged). He was not the intentional, undercover rule-breaker like some letsrun posters insinuate.
pardon me wrote:
adsfsdfad wrote:
They all hate Nike for various reason. When the pregnancy thing came out...the usual suspects all piled on Nike (while NB, Saucony, Brooks quietly updated their contracts) No one attacked Asics for their policies.
It's tiresome.
Almost not one of them read the actual decision, they just went based on the headline.
Pro runners are a collective bunch of morons.
I tend to think those defending a cheating coach are the morons.
Coevett wrote:
Nick Willis gave the best response on Twitter.
Is there anybody above him on the all-time 1500m list NOT associated with doping?
Hateraid wrote:
It's obvious that Salazar was trying to find a way to cheat.
Thankfully he finally went too far and then tapered with testing results.
just my opinion wrote:
New theory - the anti-NOP anonymous letsrun posters are pro athletes. The rest of us are fine with ethical grey area coaching.
The verdict actually makes me like Salazar better. He was trying to help his athletes in any way he could within the rules. He made mistakes, but his mistakes did not directly affect any athlete and he was only trying to protect them (like trying to make sure Galen couldn't be sabotaged). He was not the intentional, undercover rule-breaker like some letsrun posters insinuate.
asdfsafddfs wrote:
pardon me wrote:
adsfsdfad wrote:
They all hate Nike for various reason. When the pregnancy thing came out...the usual suspects all piled on Nike (while NB, Saucony, Brooks quietly updated their contracts) No one attacked Asics for their policies.
It's tiresome.
Almost not one of them read the actual decision, they just went based on the headline.
Pro runners are a collective bunch of morons.
I tend to think those defending a cheating coach are the morons.
No one is defending a cheating coach. Ironically the only proven doper among the anti-nike folks is Magness.
pardon me wrote:
asdfsafddfs wrote:
pardon me wrote:
adsfsdfad wrote:
They all hate Nike for various reason. When the pregnancy thing came out...the usual suspects all piled on Nike (while NB, Saucony, Brooks quietly updated their contracts) No one attacked Asics for their policies.
It's tiresome.
Almost not one of them read the actual decision, they just went based on the headline.
Pro runners are a collective bunch of morons.
I tend to think those defending a cheating coach are the morons.
No one is defending a cheating coach. Ironically the only proven doper among the anti-nike folks is Magness.
So you aren’t defending Salazar?
asasdafds wrote:
pardon me wrote:
asdfsafddfs wrote:
pardon me wrote:
adsfsdfad wrote:
They all hate Nike for various reason. When the pregnancy thing came out...the usual suspects all piled on Nike (while NB, Saucony, Brooks quietly updated their contracts) No one attacked Asics for their policies.
It's tiresome.
Almost not one of them read the actual decision, they just went based on the headline.
Pro runners are a collective bunch of morons.
I tend to think those defending a cheating coach are the morons.
No one is defending a cheating coach. Ironically the only proven doper among the anti-nike folks is Magness.
So you aren’t defending Salazar?
you aren't that smart are you?
White people. wrote:
Hateraid wrote:
It's obvious that Salazar was trying to find a way to cheat.
Wrong. He was trying to help his athletes without breaking any rules, the same as any good coach.
Thankfully he finally went too far and then tapered with testing results.
I don't believe that, unless you have some valid proof, and not just more "I hate minorities" rhetoric.
