I'm a 43 year old dude, about 6'5" and 185. I'm doing the Daniels 2Q plan, 70 miles a week the last 2, not less than 63 in the last month. I've hit the running mileage goals, but have thrown in a bike ride (one 43 mile gravel bike event) or very short swim here or there, sometimes helps the running legs feel better. I've never really just trained for a marathon like I have the last few months.
My marathon PR is 2:52, was training like a triathlete, so 50 was the max and was more in the 35 average per week. I've run a half in 1:20, again...like a triathlete. I've take it easy the last few years and didn't really train seriously for anything or race much. I decided to train again this year, did 35-50 for a couple months and ran a 1:36:40 25K in March. That seems to indicate I could go sub 2:50 if trained properly. I've tried to train properly, pretty much 63-70 miles the last couple months with some good workouts. I did my first XC 10K in 37:35 a month ago, slower than I do a road 10K in...but it was on dirt and some single track. A lot of my training runs have pretty big elevation, not like Chicago at all. Did a 20 miler a couple weeks ago and wrecked legs in 2:54...but it had 2500+ elevation gain. I've had some 16 milers that averaged sub 7, but there was a workout going on, so I didn't really care about the average.
I'd like to go sub 2:50. Chicago is FLAT, I never run flat and sometimes run very hilly. I can do a flat race 2 weeks before to try to see where I am at. Should it be a 5K or 10K? I feel like I could completely recover from a 10K pretty easily, but I'm also not a very experienced racer (if I enter a race I will go 100%). I'd also still be just getting ready to taper for the the "fitness test", so there would still be some fatigue involved...but that seems okay to me. Thoughts?