Okay, this has been a big topic on the boards before, but I am going to ask my questions. There are those of you who think that LSD is the way gaining greater cardiovascular fitness, more miles as a slower pace will lead to faster racing at the 5k/10k/marathon. This leads to a go-hard everyday mentatilty in which you run as far as possible each day.The otherside argues that LSD will only allow yoo to run longer, but slower and want to beleive that intervals are the way to train. The end results is thought to be increasing your VO2 over years which eventually leads to to greater endurance in race situations because your body can push harder because it experience less lactate buildup due to better O2 transport.
Intervals are thought to help get your body ready to maintain racing speeds and acclimate your body to the physiological stresses experienced during races. This leads to the hard/easy way of training in which you put your body under a lot of stress and then rest a day or two, which allows you to revover and come back .01% stronger, but over time the percenteages add up and you find that the small improvments made have lead to larger improvent over a long period of time.
This is my interpretation of the diffrent methods for training and I want to discuss the pro's and con's of each training philosophy.
With LSD, I don't see the capability for improving your speed because the main goal is to run longer. You would eventually be able to run with the same effort over a longer distance, but would do nothing to help prepare you for faster paces.
With intervals, I don't see how running a bunch of intervals at race speed will cause in increase in endurance.
I think I'm just confused what physiological changes occur in the runner between the two diffrent systems.
-what are the stresses of each system and how does this stress lead to greater improvment
-also, in both system what is the ideal "easy" day for recovery in between hard days
confused