Unofficial 2019 D3 XC Thread (Official)

What about Josh Schrader or Ryan Cox? Both of them beat Jared Pangallozzi

Coxs entertainment wrote:

What about Josh Schrader or Ryan Cox? Both of them beat Jared Pangallozzi

The top four returners are Schrader, Cox, Matteucci, and Osmulski, in that order. Schrader was looking like a god indoors before getting hurt, qualifying in all four distance events, and appears to be back close to 100% after running 3:50. Cox has been out since early January. Matteucci has also looked strong all year, but Schrader has always had him beat on grass. I think he's the very obvious favorite. Pangalozzi is kind of a dark horse pick.

I think Lucas Mueller from Carleton is gonna win it all. He ran a sick double at the MIAC conference meet. Ran a 14:22 the day after running 30:40 in the 10k.

I heard darin lou still has another year of eligibility.

Patrick Watson from Stevenson was not far behind all of those guys and has run 14:33 and 9:09 steeple...another possible dark horse pick.

The Starved Elephant wrote:

Coxs entertainment wrote:

What about Josh Schrader or Ryan Cox? Both of them beat Jared Pangallozzi

The top four returners are Schrader, Cox, Matteucci, and Osmulski, in that order. Schrader was looking like a god indoors before getting hurt, qualifying in all four distance events, and appears to be back close to 100% after running 3:50. Cox has been out since early January. Matteucci has also looked strong all year, but Schrader has always had him beat on grass. I think he's the very obvious favorite. Pangalozzi is kind of a dark horse pick.

Never mind what I said. This guy is right. Mueller is the favorite.

bump.....

kdsajkasdf wrote:

bump.....

Add Aidan Ryan to the list of contenders.

The Starved Elephant wrote:

kdsajkasdf wrote:

bump.....

Add Aidan Ryan to the list of contenders.

Sorry, but Aidan Ryan is still not a distance runner. I’ll give it to you that he was indeed the top sprinter in the 5k, but that does not make him a distance runner.

Greg Morgan, despite still on the track, is the best returning distance runner. See you in November

1. Carleton

2. Wash U

3. WIAC 1-seed

4. Pomona-Pitzer

5. North Central

6. WIAC 2-seed

7. Haverford

8. WIAC 3-seed

9. Hopkins

10. Amherst

Predictions wrote:

1. Carleton

2. Wash U

3. WIAC 1-seed

4. Pomona-Pitzer

5. North Central

6. WIAC 2-seed

7. Haverford

8. WIAC 3-seed

9. Hopkins

10. Amherst

This is trash. Wartburg could be number one, certainly not outside the top 10. Haverford is losing practically everyone so having them up there makes little sense. This seems to be a victim of historical precedent mixed with some recency bias with Carleton.

Team

1. Wartburg

2. Carleton

3. La Crosse

4. NCC

5. WashU

6. Williams

7. Hopkins

8. Geneseo

9. CMS

10. PP

Individual

1. Mueller

2. Schraeder

3. Ryan

4. Cox

5. Matteucci

These are some of the worst rankings ive ever seen

Wartburg? More like Fartburg!

Everybody has gas wrote:

Wartburg? More like Fartburg!

this is the kind of trash talking we need more of in running

FanOfTheSport wrote:

Everybody has gas wrote:

Wartburg? More like Fartburg!

this is the kind of trash talking we need more of in running

Agreed

Top three are going to Williams, Carleton, and Pomona. NCC does not podium. truth.

Pomona has the talent to be top 3, but if they want to be on the podium they are going to have to peak at nationals. Not the month before (See example: 2019 outdoor track)

take a peek wrote:

Pomona has the talent to be top 3, but if they want to be on the podium they are going to have to peak at nationals. Not the month before (See example: 2019 outdoor track)

Why Pomona? Who do they have coming back? They barely squeaked top 10 this year with Reichsling scoring 3 points. How are they a podium team without him?