Omg she wrote:
You guys just dont get it. It. Is. Hard. Being. A. Woman. I bet most of you are white. No surprise.
I'm going to have my junk and ass crack waxed so I can feel your pain. Your welcome!
Omg she wrote:
You guys just dont get it. It. Is. Hard. Being. A. Woman. I bet most of you are white. No surprise.
I'm going to have my junk and ass crack waxed so I can feel your pain. Your welcome!
men can('t) do better wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
Not much self criticism there.
And, I would counter by saying you are guilty of NO self criticism there. Tit for tat, baby. Now, finally, men's behavior is being scrutinized for the first time in history. And it has all the big alpha males whining. It's a joy to behold.
You are an angry little misandrist, aren't you? But your excitement at a blow struck for the sisterhood - or so you think - misses the point. It's not whether the ad makes men subjectively angry or offended - I dare say many men couldn't give a stuff about it and I include myself there - the issue is whether Gillette is engaging in negative gender stereotyping, and is it no less acceptable to do that about men as it is about women.
Omg she wrote:
You guys just dont get it. It. Is. Hard. Being. A. Woman. I bet most of you are white. No surprise.
Right, just look at the jobs that are 90+ perecnt men. Stuff like the lumber industry, welding, construction etc. Why aren't there more women in these jobs? You want equality, well than why don't feminist demand more women in these jobs? Majority of homeless, suicides, workplace deaths, casualties in war etc. are men. So what women get cat called occasionally. Big deal. Just ignore them. It's the end of the world I guess if a guy tries to flirt with a woman now. Talk about first World problems.
Harambe wrote:
Alpha males don't act like this.
And you know this how?
Really wrote:
Harambe wrote:
Alpha males don't act like this.
And you know this how?
Because breathlessly defending yourself from a television ad like a thirdgrader caught stealing from the cookie jar... isn't alpha? lol
Harambe was alpha, until he wasn't?
Omg she wrote:
You guys just dont get it. It. Is. Hard. Being. A. Woman. I bet most of you are white. No surprise.
Not as hard as it is being you:
https://i.imgur.com/xNf8u7f.jpgAnd.... wrote:
Harambe was alpha, until he wasn't?
Harambe was killed for being too alpha so... yea
Armstronglivs wrote:
men can('t) do better wrote:
And, I would counter by saying you are guilty of NO self criticism there. Tit for tat, baby. Now, finally, men's behavior is being scrutinized for the first time in history. And it has all the big alpha males whining. It's a joy to behold.
You are an angry little misandrist, aren't you? But your excitement at a blow struck for the sisterhood - or so you think - misses the point. It's not whether the ad makes men subjectively angry or offended - I dare say many men couldn't give a stuff about it and I include myself there - the issue is whether Gillette is engaging in negative gender stereotyping, and is it no less acceptable to do that about men as it is about women.
But it sure got you to talk (whine) about it. Now, if we could just find a way to move you to have a constructive discussion about “masculinity” then we’d be getting somewhere
Grow up man child wrote:
Most women would prob agree that they could do better. You see, women are conditioned to accept criticism. Men on the other hand either get aggressive at the mere suggestion or whine for pages upon pages.
LOL
That was funny 10/10
But because it was written on this board, I assumed that it must be true, so I tried to give my wife some constructive criticism last night.
It didn't go like "grow up man child" thought. I should have relied on my instinct and not rely on "grow up man child"'s opinion. It really did not end well.
Goobermmm wrote:
Armstronglivs wrote:
You are an angry little misandrist, aren't you? But your excitement at a blow struck for the sisterhood - or so you think - misses the point. It's not whether the ad makes men subjectively angry or offended - I dare say many men couldn't give a stuff about it and I include myself there - the issue is whether Gillette is engaging in negative gender stereotyping, and is it no less acceptable to do that about men as it is about women.
But it sure got you to talk (whine) about it. Now, if we could just find a way to move you to have a constructive discussion about “masculinity” then we’d be getting somewhere
How about negative gender stereotyping - which is what the ad represents - or doesn't that bother you, so long as it only applies to men?
Harambe wrote:
And.... wrote:
Harambe was alpha, until he wasn't?
Harambe was killed for being too alpha so... yea
Harambeta
Rerereread wrote:
MarxistCucksAreTrash wrote:
Been shaving with Schick since last week. Feelsgoodman.
I’m can’t help but laugh at all the Leftist outrage on this thread. What did all the Leftists think was going to happen when they released the ad? People are supporting businesses based on their own self interests, what’s wrong with that?
I don’t care to do business with P&G anymore and apparently many others feel the same way. All the Leftists are free to do business with P&G if they desire, no skin off my nose.
What “leftist outrage” are you seeing on this thread. The large majority of outrage posted is not from leftists.
Seriously look at the past few pages and tell me where most of the outrage is coming from.
Dumb ad, dumb outrage.
Goobermmm wrote:
But it sure got you to talk (whine) about it. Now, if we could just find a way to move you to have a constructive discussion about “masculinity” then we’d be getting somewhere
Actual men have neither the time or 'need' to have a "constructive conversation" about masculinity. As well documented here on letsrun, that's the domain of misandrist hags and their cvckhold pseudo-male patsies.
We need to start talking about toxic femininity...
cane toad wrote:
Goobermmm wrote:
But it sure got you to talk (whine) about it. Now, if we could just find a way to move you to have a constructive discussion about “masculinity” then we’d be getting somewhere
Actual men have neither the time or 'need' to have a "constructive conversation" about masculinity. As well documented here on letsrun, that's the domain of misandrist hags and their cvckhold pseudo-male patsies.
Meh.
The clitoris has 8,000 nerve endings and still isn’t as sensitive as a white man on the internet
Goobermmmm wrote:
cane toad wrote:
Actual men have neither the time or 'need' to have a "constructive conversation" about masculinity. As well documented here on letsrun, that's the domain of misandrist hags and their cvckhold pseudo-male patsies.
Meh.
The clitoris has 8,000 nerve endings and still isn’t as sensitive as a white man on the internet
What's your obsession with people's skin color?