---

The Jamaica Observer wrote:
“It feels really great to run for Jamaica. When I was younger I would always travel to Jamaica to see my family and I fell in love with the country at first sight, and growing up I would always watch the Jamaican athletes running on TV and it amazed me. So that spurred the decision to represent Jamaica rather than USA,” Williams told the Jamaica Observer shortly before departing her home in Florida for Jamaica yesterday.

---

---

Sdfsdfsdfsdfsdfsdf wrote:

I don't think the penalty for competing for Jamaica rather than the US would be that large for a sprinter. Jamaica is probably the most track knowledgeable country in the world, at least for just the sprint events.

---

---

s. brin wrote:

so it took you all of 8 minutes to answer your own question?

---

---

Predictor wrote:

Aisha Praught, Rai Benjamin. I don't understand the rules. Aren't all of these athletes American? They have real US birth certificates and they attend US public school where they break US High School records. I also would like to know like rojo if they are locked in.

---

---

rojo wrote:

---

s. brin wrote:

so it took you all of 8 minutes to answer your own question?

---

That article didn't really answer my question.

1) Athletes often give PR friendly answers to the media.
2) I still don't know at what age or level of competition your country locks in - that's big for me.
3) Nor do we know if a US sprinter would make more than a Jamaican

---

---

Cottonshirt wrote:

this whole thread appears to based on an assumption that rojo has made concerning Sonia O'Sullivan's daughter having the right to change her affiliated nation. without that assumption, which I think is false, there would be no question concerning Briana Williams' running for the US.

you could always just read the rules.

In order to understand the relevant rule, you first need to know that IAAF Rule 1 defines competitions to which the rules apply. and the following parts of Rule 1 are relevant here:
1. (a) the World Athletics Series and the Olympic Games.
1. (b) The Athletics programme of Area, Regional or Group Games not confined to participants from a single Area where the IAAF does not have exclusive control.
1. (c) Regional or Group Championships in Athletics not confined to participants from a single Area.
1. (f) Area Championships and other intra-Area competitions organised by an Area Association.
1. (g) The Athletics programme of Area, Regional or Group Games, and Regional or Group Championships in Athletics confined to participants from a single Area.

those are the competitions defined under Rule 1. 1(a), (b), (c), (f) or (g), that get mentioned a lot in Rule 5.

Rule 5 deals with Eligibility to Represent a member (nations are members of the IAAF and athletes represent members).

Rule 5
1. In International Competitions held under Rules 1.1(a), (b), (c), (f) or (g), Members shall be represented only by athletes who are Citizens of the Country (or Territory) which the affiliated Member represents and who comply with the eligibility requirements of this Rule 5.

2. An athlete who has never competed in an International Competition under Rules 1.1(a), (b), (c), (f) or (g) shall be eligible to represent a Member in an International Competition under Rules 1.1(a), (b), (c), (f) or (g) if he is a Citizen of the Country (or Territory) by virtue of having been born or by virtue of having a parent or grandparent born in the Country (or Territory).

3. Subject to Rule 5.4, an athlete who has represented a Member in an International Competition held under Rules 1.1(a), (b), (c), (f) or (g) shall not be eligible to represent another Member in an International Competition held under Rules 1.1(a), (b), (c), (f) or (g).

4. An athlete who has represented a Member in an International Competition under Rules 1.1(a), (b), (c), (f) or (g) shall be eligible to represent another Member in an International Competition under Rules 1.1(a), (b), (c), (f) or (g) (with immediate effect unless otherwise stated) in the following circumstances only:

(a) if the Country (or Territory) of the Member is subsequently incorporated in another Country that is or subsequently becomes a Member; (b) if the Country (or Territory) of the Member ceases to exist and the athlete becomes a Citizen as of right of a newly formed Country ratified by Treaty or otherwise recognised at international level that subsequently becomes a Member; (c) if the Territory of the Member does not have a National Olympic Committee and an athlete qualifies to compete at the Olympic Games for the Territory’s parent Country. In such a case, the athlete’s representation of the Territory’s parent Country at the Olympic Games shall not affect his eligibility to continue to compete for the relevant Member Territory in other International Competitions under Rules 1.1(a), (b), (c), (f) or (g). emphasis added.

I didn't see anything in there that made the rules age specific. the defining criteria seems to be the category of competition an athlete participates in. if you compete in an even not covered by Rule 1. 1(a), (b), (c), (f) or (g), then it appears that you can still choose who to compete for. but once you've competed in a competition defined under Rule 1. 1(a), (b), (c), (f) or (g), you're locked in.

cheers.

---

---

Awhagwan wrote:

At this point, Its not about the money. It's the pride one gets that is deep rooted and exhilarating. Briana's mother is from Jamaica. Briana is Jamaican. The fact she is being raised in the USA is great...much more opportunity and choices in life are good to have.

In terms of money, yes, its undeniable. Should she rise to the level of SRR, who is also Jamaican by heritage if not more, the financial incentive and long term return is greater.

I have always wondered if SRR is missing a part of her soul because at the end of the day if she had to do it over again, would she rather have represented the land of wood and water?

---