Have you been to the grocery store lately, all the women wear yoga pants.
Have you been to the grocery store lately, all the women wear yoga pants.
When I ran track, girls had the option of the bunhugger bottoms or the half-tight style bottoms. I've not heard any outrage from any women, so I assume there is no problem on their end. Male distance runners' short-shorts that expose some bun aren't much different.
Cake is everywhere today. I saw like 14 butt cheeks just walking around town today. Some cake in track and field is the least of society's problems.
curiouscat wrote:
As a strait man I enjoy looking at girls. But I've always wondered if college women like those super small bottoms, basically compression panties. I can't imagine thousands of girls in college like wearing those. Do they have an advantage over short compression shorts? Or do you think perhaps a lot of pedo coaches wanna see girls wearing them?
Pics?
curiouscat wrote:
As a strait man I enjoy looking at girls. But I've always wondered if college women like those super small bottoms, basically compression panties. I can't imagine thousands of girls in college like wearing those. Do they have an advantage over short compression shorts? Or do you think perhaps a lot of pedo coaches wanna see girls wearing them?
I'm not sure you know what pedo means. While it is certainly wrong for a college coach to be take advantage of his athletes, that doesn't make him a pedo.
curiouscat wrote:
As a strait man I enjoy looking at girls. But I've always wondered if college women like those super small bottoms, basically compression panties. I can't imagine thousands of girls in college like wearing those. Do they have an advantage over short compression shorts? Or do you think perhaps a lot of pedo coaches wanna see girls wearing them?
What's wrong with just normal short-shorts? Many athletes actually look more attractive in them anyway.
And I also don't understand why women need to have a bare midriff when they race, while men are just fine keeping their stomach unexposed?
Can someone explain this to me?
we women usually prefer shorts, just for the exposure aspect. some women definitely prefer to compete in the tiniest briefs for best range of motion, but that is not the norm. I remember when women's pole vault was introduced and the briefs were crazy small for those athletes. just like women's beach volleyball... all about ratings on tv for men with big eyes. gross.
why do women wear tiny briefs but no speedos for men? feel free to contemplate that.
women wearing yoga pants to walmart is not women wearing tiny briefs. big difference. and how many of those 14 butt cheeks you saw were men's?
Birthday cake wrote:
When I ran track, girls had the option of the bunhugger bottoms or the half-tight style bottoms. I've not heard any outrage from any women, so I assume there is no problem on their end. Male distance runners' short-shorts that expose some bun aren't much different.
Cake is everywhere today. I saw like 14 butt cheeks just walking around town today. Some cake in track and field is the least of society's problems.
Too much cake is making for size 14 butt cheeks.
Would love to see her in bunhuggers...or better yet...out of them.
no spankies please wrote:
we women usually prefer shorts, just for the exposure aspect. some women definitely prefer to compete in the tiniest briefs for best range of motion, but that is not the norm. I remember when women's pole vault was introduced and the briefs were crazy small for those athletes. just like women's beach volleyball... all about ratings on tv for men with big eyes. gross.
why do women wear tiny briefs but no speedos for men? feel free to contemplate that.
women wearing yoga pants to walmart is not women wearing tiny briefs. big difference. and how many of those 14 butt cheeks you saw were men's?
These young women choose to expose their bodies. Nobody is forcing them to do so. Men choose not to. It might be your knee-jerk reaction to blame everything on men and the patriarchy, but people have choices and in this case it is clear that women choose to wear what they wear.
I choose to expose my legs! And I'm met with bad reactions.
If only I had the face of Cristiano Ronaldo.
Degrading? I think if you consider a female body degrading, then sure.
Otherwise, they aren't required to wear them, right? Don't they have an option of a few different bottoms to wear? Briefs, shorts, etc.
WTFBBQ wrote:
Degrading? I think if you consider a female body degrading, then sure.
Our culture's idea that the human body is disgusting and embarrassing is absolutely baffling to me. Why the heck should anyone feel degraded by the sight of their own damn legs?
bodies aren't degrading wrote:
Our culture's idea that the human body is disgusting and embarrassing is absolutely baffling to me. Why the heck should anyone feel degraded by the sight of their own damn legs?
Nobody thinks that. It's basically debating if track meets should be a place that encourages sexual excitement.
Stalingrader wrote:
no spankies please wrote:
we women usually prefer shorts, just for the exposure aspect. some women definitely prefer to compete in the tiniest briefs for best range of motion, but that is not the norm. I remember when women's pole vault was introduced and the briefs were crazy small for those athletes. just like women's beach volleyball... all about ratings on tv for men with big eyes. gross.
why do women wear tiny briefs but no speedos for men? feel free to contemplate that.
women wearing yoga pants to walmart is not women wearing tiny briefs. big difference. and how many of those 14 butt cheeks you saw were men's?
These young women choose to expose their bodies. Nobody is forcing them to do so. Men choose not to. It might be your knee-jerk reaction to blame everything on men and the patriarchy, but people have choices and in this case it is clear that women choose to wear what they wear.
Maybe you should re read my post.
You, however, are suggesting women choose to expose their bodies and NO men choose to expose their bodies. Really? Interesting argument.
https://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/bearded-man-in-short-shorts.jpgcheek leak wrote:
Stalingrader wrote:
These young women choose to expose their bodies. Nobody is forcing them to do so. Men choose not to. It might be your knee-jerk reaction to blame everything on men and the patriarchy, but people have choices and in this case it is clear that women choose to wear what they wear.
Maybe you should re read my post.
You, however, are suggesting women choose to expose their bodies and NO men choose to expose their bodies. Really? Interesting argument.
https://fellowshipofminds.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/bearded-man-in-short-shorts.jpg
This only proves that you are demented.
Demented? Because of cheek leak? Is this an across the board thing, or just when men show cheek leak? Because I thought you were defending women who choose to expose their bodies. Why not men?
To fully discuss this question we must post pics.
What I want to know is why they don't them for men
Free_the_thigh wrote:
What I want to know is why they don't them for men
*dont make them
Sand Dunes wrote:
To fully discuss this question we must post pics.
I ain't complaining.
https://www.instagram.com/p/Bf_9MLoDX7p/?utm_source=ig_share_sheet&igshid=152wwkvdo0v4x