Yeah, according to the Purdy tables, since I can run a 10.5 in the 100 I should be able to run 2:20 for a marathon. And I don't even train hard, like 5 miles a week. God distance running is such a joke, all you fools slobbering all over yourselves to qualify for the Olympic Trials, running 150 miles a week, living like hermits and shit........
Any good college sprinter can run a 2:20 marathon. Why don't you guys just give it up? Losers.
FUCK YOU TROLL
He does make a good point.
iloverunning wrote:
FUCK YOU TROLL
Sounds like the desperate bleatings of someone who will neither run 10.5 for 100m nor 2:20 for a marathon. I feel bad for you, I really do.
HE CAN REALLY RUN A 2 20 MARATHON....BUT HE FORGOT TO SAY HE RUNS WITH A BIG FAT COCK IN HIS MOUTH!!
i know him .... wrote:
HE CAN REALLY RUN A 2 20 MARATHON....BUT HE FORGOT TO SAY HE RUNS WITH A BIG FAT COCK IN HIS MOUTH!!
Yeah and according to the Purdy tables, running a 2:20 with a big fat cock in your mouth is worth 2:09 running normally. Damn impressive if you ask me.
Worth 2:08 with that pole up his ass.
Obviously a troll, but he does bring up a point which it would be good to emphasize again.
Purdy points are not meant to predict what one could run at distance X based upon performance at distance Y. They are meant to compare the quality of performance (with respect to the world's top marks).
For example, the Olympic champ at the high jump is not going to be the same person as the Olympic champ at the 5000m, but they could very well be performances of equal quality.
But, I think we all know this stuff.
Spike Lee wrote:
Worth 2:08 with that pole up his ass.
What scores highest on the Purdy points calculator?
a) Running a 2:08 marathon with a pole up your ass
b) Running a 13:55 in trainers
c) Running 26:19 for 10k using the "pose" method
d) Running 4.1 for da forty
You are still slower than Flojo.
Pat carrol sub 4 mile. 2.09 marathon
Then there is Rod Dixon.
then Paula, with a 2:15 marathon should be able to run a 10.3 hundred.
I improved my Marathon time by 25%. When you can run 7.5secs for the 100 come back and tell us.
Let's take this the other way around....
Hey, my name's Paul Tergat (let's say, but I'm obviously not), and I can run a 2:04:55 marathon, so, by the Purdy tables, I can run 100 meters in 9.59!
Sprinter, why are you so freakin slow?? You need to do more long slow runs, so you can SPRINT!!!
Purdy girls wrote:
Spike Lee wrote:Worth 2:08 with that pole up his ass.
What scores highest on the Purdy points calculator?
a) Running a 2:08 marathon with a pole up your ass
b) Running a 13:55 in trainers
c) Running 26:19 for 10k using the "pose" method
d) Running 4.1 for da forty
What are you talking about? EVERYONE on letsrun can run a 13:55 in trainers. I'd say the most impressive is the 4.1 in da forty, hand timed of course.
Your nationality is evidently displayed in your post, obviously, you are a member of the 59 millions, stupidity is your religion.