And yet we still post like we're 15 year olds.
the poster is referencing this from quantcast:
http://www.letsrun.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/letsrun-smart.png
The full article is here:
https://www.quantcast.com/blog/ranking-websites-by-demographics/
That's nice but nobody cares.
Go toot your pathetic self absorbed horns somewhere else
Rei wrote:
And yet we still post like we're 15 year olds.
Aren't you the guy who prances around in Canadian short shorts even though you're not Canadian? Glass houses...
I knew that my U of Phoenix degree meant something!
Try This wrote:
He pave, she pave, it pave ... wrote:This is all the proof I need.
😂😂😂😂
Seriously, this is spectacular.
Wow. I have advanced degrees and get treated like shit on this site. Go figure.
umm jezebel is ranked higher than letsrun
Woo hoo! Dilbert.com above 80%!
Sad!
The american sport kind of pegs itself against the NCAA. It's our professional league basically except it's not professional.
Bankrupt deadspin coming in at 2!
If this is true then I am deeply dissappointed in whatever educational system lead to the quality of these message boards.
But then again, there's something about "inferential statistical models" that screams bogus to me.
We've always said the best part about LetsRun.com is you - our daily visitors- and that LetsRun.com is a community made up of the smartest and most passionate track and field fans in the world.
Now we pave proof. From quantcast:
http://www.letsrun.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/letsrun-smart.png
The full article is here:
https://www.quantcast.com/blog/ranking-websites-by-demographics/
Thanks for visiting.
Methodology flaw:
Tons of "runners" exist, who got free education (scholarship) because they trot not so slow as the hobbiest of joggers. Then they connect to LRC with their no-brainer degrees, and tilt the numbers.
But here's the better chart from the blogpost: why are old dudes reading so much news/politics?
Give violinsts scholarship too wrote:
Methodology flaw:
Tons of "runners" exist, who got free education (scholarship) because they trot not so slow as the hobbiest of joggers. Then they connect to LRC with their no-brainer degrees, and tilt the numbers.
Not true. There are plenty of potential methodology flaws, but the number of huge scholarships out there for distance runners is insignificant.
I'm not even sure what half of those ones ahead of us are.
We are making strides, but can we at least pass Salon? Good grief!
Maybe when that happens we can hoist a banner at the annual Letsrun.com gala. I think the 2018 gala is scheduled for the Days Inn in Mankato, MN, so let's all shoot for that! See you there...first round is on me!
Apparently, outliers like ventolin and tony the tiger were excluded in the computations.
I call bullshit, just look at the morons on this message board.
You're proud to be #22 on a list that ranks celebitchy.com #4? Really?
Since I was banned I stopped caring about posting and my life has gotten better but I have to say there are some serious flaws with this study... Far too many to list really.
