Anyone got a time?
How fast did The Freeze run that 100m tonight?
Pro News/Info/Results
Sprints
Report Thread
You are reporting this thread to the moderators for review and possible removal from the forum.
-
-
I too would like to know
-
It doesn't matter. He is a 10.5 guy and it's all about entertainment. You're not going to see a 9.90 from him.
-
nigel talton 6.73i, 10.47, 21.66
-
low 11s
-
I timed it twice. 10.7h both times.
-
He ran 120 meters.
-
notrump wrote:
He ran 120 meters.
Uh, no. -
I have it on VERY good authority that he ran a 9.71. The guy is REALLY FAST!!!
-
I had him in 10.05 hh. Slower than Rodgers but much more relaxed . Would have been a good race.
-
I timed him in 10.79. Start when you see the smoke from the handgun, and stop after you 'see' him cross the finish line.
-
did anyone else read the ESPN article over him, and cringe hard when they mentioned that he "narrowly missed the OT" (it wasn't close).
-
to most citizens 0.27 seconds is a very, very small amount time.
the kobe of being bad wrote:
did anyone else read the ESPN article over him, and cringe hard when they mentioned that he "narrowly missed the OT" (it wasn't close). -
Jill St John 162 wrote:
to most citizens 0.27 seconds is a very, very small amount time.
the kobe of being bad wrote:
did anyone else read the ESPN article over him, and cringe hard when they mentioned that he "narrowly missed the OT" (it wasn't close).
To what citizens is over a quarter of a second in a 100 not a lot? I guess if you're Russian you can always dope your way down -
PrZ wrote:
Jill St John 162 wrote:
to most citizens 0.27 seconds is a very, very small amount time.
the kobe of being bad wrote:
did anyone else read the ESPN article over him, and cringe hard when they mentioned that he "narrowly missed the OT" (it wasn't close).
To what citizens is over a quarter of a second in a 100 not a lot? I guess if you're Russian you can always dope your way down
To all (vast majority) of citizens that only watch track once every 4 years. .25 to them is probably a close race when visualizing while reading an article. -
He is a necessary evil. Like Mr. Freeze in Batman. He actually generates attention for our sport.
-
handelandj wrote:
Anyone got a time?
Loved the guy who finished first who did the Bolt arrow shot and the guy who finished second told the interviewer that " God has plans for me" and pointed to the sky. Hilarious. -
thesad troof wrote:
nigel talton 6.73i, 10.47, 21.66
Not fast by Track standards, but WAY faster than the average person. Hey he puts on a show, races fans, the thing that surprises me is he wins most of the time, I would think top local High Schoolers or people with a college track background would show up to beat him, do they screen out his competition? -
PrZ wrote:
Jill St John 162 wrote:
to most citizens 0.27 seconds is a very, very small amount time.
the kobe of being bad wrote:
did anyone else read the ESPN article over him, and cringe hard when they mentioned that he "narrowly missed the OT" (it wasn't close).
To what citizens is over a quarter of a second in a 100 not a lot? I guess if you're Russian you can always dope your way down
If only Russians would emulate American 100m runners, the absolute pinnacle of cleanliness. -
Anyone have a video link of the race?
