I don't get this. She tested positive for a prohibited substance, but was able to provide evidence that it was prescribed. So no ban, only a public finger-wagging at her. No TUE on her part.
So, the stuff is prohibited. But since she had a prescription, it's OK? This doesn't make sense to me since there was no TUE. Dawn Harper-Nelson got a 3 month ban.
Not hating on Molly, but the rulings of USADA seem very arbitrary.