Bolt's WRs in the 100 and 200 are rated ridiculously high on the IAAF scoring tables compared to every other WR. Here is a breakdown by event, time, and score:
100m: 9.58; 1356
200m: 19.19; 1351
400m: 43.03; 1321
800m: 1:40.91; 1301
1500m: 3:26.00; 1302
5000m: 12:37.35; 1294
10000m: 26:17.53; 1295
110m hurdles: 12.80; 1294
400m hurdles: 46.78; 1296
3000m steeple: 7:53.63; 1288
Half marathon: 58:23; 1261
Marathon: 2:02:57; 1291
In order for the rest of the events to match Bolt's 100m performance (reach a score of 1356), here is what the WRs would have to be:
200m: 19.16
400m: 42.55
800m: 1:39.24
1500m: 3:22.38
5000m: 12:21.34
10000m: 25:41.34
110m hurdles: 12.50
400m hurdles: 45.66
3000m steeple: 7:39.48
Half marathon: 56:13
Marathon: 1:59:34
Are the tables skewed to favor the sprints, or is Bolt really that much better than every other track athlete in history?