I recorded some videos of myself practicing hurdles and have been analyzing them. I normally run distance but I've been adding some hurdle practices after distance practice.
While running at about 4:30/1600m pace, it looks like my strides are about 0.26 seconds each (7 steps in 1.79 seconds). But that would be a cadence of ~235 steps per minute, which seems way too high for a slow runner like myself. I'm 5'1" so my legs are really short, do short people normally have a naturally high cadence? 235 steps/min at 4:30 pace is roughly 1.5m per step.
I had a running evaluation done and my cadence was 172 +/- 3 steps per minute at 5.2 mph (11:32 pace, it was my first time running again after a stress fracture) on a treadmill. This was a high tech treadmill that measured basically everything so the number should be accurate.
Why is taking fewer steps between hurdles better? Isn't a higher cadence good for sprints? Should I be trying to lengthen my strides and decrease my turnover so I take fewer steps between hurdles?