NXN will for sure crown the HS boy XC champion in 2016. It's not even close this year. It will not even be a discussion. I feel bad for Affolder for having chosen Footlocker. But then again, he should come in top 3 at Footlocker, whereas he would have had trouble breaking into the top 10 at NXN.
9 of the top 10 HS boys (by PR) will be running NXN this year. The only top 10 guy missing (Eckstein) actually came 11th in his region, so he simply didn't qualify (he had a bad race).
Affolder, currently ranked 11th, is the "highest ranked" runner who only tried to qualify for Footlocker (and not NXN).
NXN is the clear winner this year.
The national champion will be crowned at NXN.
Ftftcffftfftyvf wrote:
9 of the top 10 HS boys (by PR) will be running NXN this year. The only top 10 guy missing (Eckstein) actually came 11th in his region, so he simply didn't qualify (he had a bad race).
Affolder, currently ranked 11th, is the "highest ranked" runner who only tried to qualify for Footlocker (and not NXN).
NXN is the clear winner this year.
The national champion will be crowned at NXN.
And will be most years going forward. Footlocker screwed this up years ago and the steady march toward NXN was easily foreseeable.
You can't just look at PR in cross country. A fast time usually just means a pancake or short course. Milesplit has affolder as number 3, despite his PR being slower than others below him.
Wendell Gee wrote:
...
And will be most years going forward. Footlocker screwed this up years ago and the steady march toward NXN was easily foreseeable.
Yes, it makes sense. Most top HS runners come from top school programs. As a coach, even if you have one superstar, it makes more sense to want to bring your whole team to a national championship, rather than one or two runners. NXN offers that opportunity. Pretty quickly, top runners (in weaker programs) will want to have the chance to run against the best (who are now mostly running NXN) and therefore choose to go to NXN.
NXN has been the top race for girls for the last 4 years. I believe that this is the first year that the FL boy winner will not be the national champion.
Not that simple wrote:
You can't just look at PR in cross country. A fast time usually just means a pancake or short course. Milesplit has affolder as number 3, despite his PR being slower than others below him.
Correct.
So who are the top 5 or 10 in your mind?
Are they running NXN?
Both races get the top runners in the United States. Some years one will have a couple better runners and then it will switch around. No story here.
unify the belt...... wrote:
Both races get the top runners in the United States. Some years one will have a couple better runners and then it will switch around. No story here.
No switching around.
FL past winners:
2015: Hunter
2014: Fisher
2013: Fisher
2012: Ches
2011: Ches
2010: LV
2009: LV
...
...all the best in the nation
This will be the first year that NXN > FL on the boy's side
Didn't Seth qualify for footlocker nationals??
Yeah but he also qualified for NXN I believe
Hmmmmmmm wrote:
Didn't Seth qualify for footlocker nationals??
No, he qualified for NXN
Stand corrected, he also qualified for FL
If he wins NXN (and FL), then FL streak will continue.
Ftftcffftfftyvf wrote:
9 of the top 10 HS boys (by PR) will be running NXN this year. The only top 10 guy missing (Eckstein) actually came 11th in his region, so he simply didn't qualify (he had a bad race).
Using PRs is a pretty terrible measure for anything off the track. Even looking at the dyestat individual rankings, there are 25-35 different guys that could easily make an argument for a top 10 spot.
macdaddy wrote:
Ftftcffftfftyvf wrote:9 of the top 10 HS boys (by PR) will be running NXN this year. The only top 10 guy missing (Eckstein) actually came 11th in his region, so he simply didn't qualify (he had a bad race).
Using PRs is a pretty terrible measure for anything off the track. Even looking at the dyestat individual rankings, there are 25-35 different guys that could easily make an argument for a top 10 spot.
Ok, please list them and tell me how many of them will be at NXN.
Cfggcffhfhvhjgv wrote:
unify the belt...... wrote:Both races get the top runners in the United States. Some years one will have a couple better runners and then it will switch around. No story here.
No switching around.
FL past winners:
2015: Hunter
2014: Fisher
2013: Fisher
2012: Ches
2011: Ches
2010: LV
2009: LV
...
...all the best in the nation
This will be the first year that NXN > FL on the boy's side
Wow..It's not even close. Footlocker has consistently has the stud boy in the last half of a decade. Thanks for the facts!
http://dyestatxcrankings.runnerspace.com/gprofile.php?mgroup_id=46052&do=news&news_id=448988Ttfftfttfftygygyg wrote:
macdaddy wrote:Using PRs is a pretty terrible measure for anything off the track. Even looking at the dyestat individual rankings, there are 25-35 different guys that could easily make an argument for a top 10 spot.
Ok, please list them and tell me how many of them will be at NXN.
Dyestats Top 30 as of 11/17 (10 days ago) - they generally update them every 2 weeks, so we will have a much better idea come Wednesday/Thursday once the rankings are posted. I believe this will be the 2nd to last update (with ALL state finals, as well as NXN and Footlocker qualifying meets in the books).
Says who? I think last year it would have been one heck of a race between Kelati and Rainsberger.
Not only will the top individuals be at NXN but Footlocker NE had 92 finishers in the girl's champ race and 139 in the boy's champ race.....paltry numbers to say the least as far as totals, FL had between 700-800 participants while NXN/NYNE had 2300! Has the tide really shifted?
Asbel Kiprop wrote:
Not only will the top individuals be at NXN but Footlocker NE had 92 finishers in the girl's champ race and 139 in the boy's champ race.....paltry numbers to say the least as far as totals, FL had between 700-800 participants while NXN/NYNE had 2300! Has the tide really shifted?
Who really cares about ~2250 of those?
Wendell Gee wrote:
And will be most years going forward. Footlocker screwed this up years ago and the steady march toward NXN was easily foreseeable.
How did Foot Locker screw this up? They were sponsoring the best thing about HS running for 2 decades and then one of their biggest customers - Nike - decides to do its own race. You'd think Nike would do something like that Nike Cross Nationals Presented by Foot Locker . Or have the individual champ called the Foot Locker champ?