400/mile times

Mine are sad so I won't post them, but 58 and 4:39 must mean either you haven't run a good 400m or you have a great aerobic background. Either way, good job.

Mile PR 4:47, 400 PR 53.8. Perhaps I should have done more aerobic work? :>)

56 / 4:29

Guys, I have a feeling that he's looking for guys that have actually run a fast mile to see what kind of 400 speed a guy would probably need to actually get down to a 4:05. It doesn't do him much good to say you've run a 53 and a 4:45 IMO because you are obviously not really much of a miler or you don't have very many miles under you.

53/4:29

52.5/4:05.51

cheers

Mr. Young, is that 400m time recent or an all-time best?

57 high 400, 4:24 1600

55 second 400 , 4:30 1500

my 400 best is 56, mile best is 4:32. I think it might be rather common for distance runners to have a weak 400 time but be able to sustain 400's not much slower than that for a workout. I saw an 8:15 3k runner run a 55 or 56 in an open 400 but then be able to run 59-59 in an 800.

55.0 relay split immediately after a 3200 (I'm positive I could've run a 54 otherwise)

4:22 1600m

I think you can run a 4:05 with 52-53 400m speed if you have lots of aerobic talent and develop it decently well.

You have to run at least 54 sec if you want to run 4.05!

50/4:22 in high school

47/148 in college (no mile racing for me:) )

By the way, he's talking 1500m times, not 1600m times. He wants to run the equivalent of 4:23 for the 1600m.

400m. 48.96

1500m 3.48

Schlong wrote:

55.0 relay split immediately after a 3200 (I'm positive I could've run a 54 otherwise)

4:22 1600m

I think you can run a 4:05 with 52-53 400m speed if you have lots of aerobic talent and develop it decently well.

yes but very few are able to work off of that 52-53 speed and develop his mile

53, 438

51sec 400

6:28 mile

the 400 is from last year, and the mile is from 7th grade, so not sure that's much help...

400 - 52.9

1600 - 4:20.0