Let's not forget that most of us got into this sport because we discovered at a very early age that we were better at distance running than all of our peers.
For any of us who have discipline, focus, and high standards, they were developed AFTER the recognition of some talent (I could have better discipline, focus, and high standards). It is rare that someone stunk it up initially and then through the application of the aforementioned things, became stellar.
It is all relative. Scott Fry talks about being only a 5:04 1600 runner and 10:45 3200 runner as a freshman in high school and that he improved greatly from there. While those aren't stellar times, they are hardly horrible either. Most of the guys on my HS track team had 3200 times of 11:30 or so even as seniors (we had a lot of distance runners). I remember when one senior who had stuck it out for 4 years ran a 5:55 1600 in his last meet to break 6:00 for the first time, and he was ecstatic. Some posters here would think he was a loser. He did the same kinds of workouts that I did (not as fast though). He ran the same amount of mileage. He just didn't have the talent to go faster.
So, I don't think we are either. That guy from my high school team (Doug) put in all the work, got no recognition from anyone at school except for a couple of us on the team who were rooting for him to finally run a sub 6:00 1600. He did it to be in shape and to be a member of the team. He worked as hard or harder than I did and yet his name was never engraved on a trophy, he never was named to an all-league team, he didn't earn a varsity letter and was always listed as "participant" at the end of the year awards banquet. To me, he deserves more recognition than anyone blessed with a little bit of talent.