I generally enjoy discussing running with most fellow runners, but I do not enjoy discussing it in other situations. There is so little knowledge of running and what runners do to accomplish their goals. There is also so little knowledge of the sport in general and what might constitute a respectable performance among older or age group runners. No one seems to think there is much difference between a 25 year old and a 50 year old. We are human beings and we are all out there running, and so what is the difference, right? Actually, as one co-worker once said to me, we are "practicing," as he said he saw me on the roads "practicing."
Even beyond the aspect of age, which is key, there is just no working knowledge or frame of reference for a runner's time at a particular distance. After training for a few years, and running 5k to half, I ran my first marathon this fall, and I hate answering the "What was your time?" question because no one seems to have any frame of reference for it. I say "3:02," and I get a blank stare or perhaps a nod. Why bother asking if you have no idea what the specific time might mean or indicate? I gather the guy in my office who was telling me yesterday that he ran his first 5k, after seven months of training, in 22:11 is about the same as a sub-elite running 2:25 in the marathon or a 45-49 guy running 3:02. I say this because the 22:11 guy asked me if I have run half marathons or marathons, and then the aspect of time came up. He had that blank-ish look on his face. He also "did not realize" that one has to run a qualifier for New York or Boston.
With so many other sports so well understood, this conception of running seems strange.