Magness on Genzebe: "The arrogance of it all is astounding"

Anyone that runs faster than his athletes must be up to no good. After all, he is the best coach on the planet. According to him. I've seen his kind before.

Yawn...

This was six seconds slower than her own record. A sign she is not quite 100%. When fit I wouldn't have problem running a 3k within 6 seconds of peak ability two days after a mile race.

In case Magness didn't know, she gets paid based on winning races, not tweeting.

8:22 is crappy compared to her ability level

Magness is a tool who squandered his talent.

Greatly talented physically, but destructive, and a failure mentally.

Besides that he's a screwball.

Any guy that had 3:50/14:15 ability would be able to hit all of the times she's run recently with no problem.

And a 3:50/14:15 combo is not at all rare for college men.

8:22 for 3000 isn't great for someone running 14 low at 5K.

And the 4:13 mile also isn't impressive for that type of runner.

Her mile equivalent is about 4:08.

How can anybody see Dibaba's name at the top of this list and not seriously consider the prospect that she's doping?

http://www.alltime-athletics.com/w_1500ok.htm

Dude is a screwball but this woman is one of the most blatant dopers I've ever seen. She is arrogant and running too damn fast - to the point where her cheating is obvious.

It seems like the biggest cheats lack the willpower to "hold back" to make their cheating a little less apparent. See Radcliffe with the 2:15, Ramzi with the 3:32 in the Olympic heats, Bolt in 2009, and so on......

@swift_girl posts about drug cheats all damn day. Seems to think any Africans (or NOP) is doping. Offers no proof other than Britain can't produce any other sub-28 10k guys.

She looks pretty fit in her selfies though, I'll give her that.

Valsu, the Mage wrote:this woman is one of the most blatant dopers I've ever seen. She is arrogant and running too damn fast - to the point where her cheating is obvious.

What is it in her demeanour or actions that warrants being called arrogant?

How fast is a woman allowed to run?

Ridiculous post.

The thing that makes us all nervous is the combination of her performances, her isolation from testing, Jama Aden's potential links with Driouch's doping.

She can't be condemned just for being fast. Her sister is the best 10,000m runner ever; why shouldn't she be the best female miler ever? Someone's got to be.

Oh, come on! wrote:

How can anybody see Dibaba's name at the top of this list and not seriously consider the prospect that she's doping?

http://www.alltime-athletics.com/w_1500ok.htm

Because Africans have the genetic profile of racehorses. They are the closest thing to selective breeding that you will see short of elites reproducing together.

And they are doing that to.

swift girl is really attractive in person, actually. pretty hot.

Jeff Albertson wrote:

@swift_girl posts about drug cheats all damn day. Seems to think any Africans (or NOP) is doping. Offers no proof other than Britain can't produce any other sub-28 10k guys.

She looks pretty fit in her selfies though, I'll give her that.

What proof do you want her to give, exactly?

So unless one has proof, one shouldn't speculate about doping?

Of course a guy like him can not understand how someone can run fast. Has he ever coached anyone who ended up running fast?

Of the three performances you cite, only one is confirmed dirty.

Maybe you, not the competitors, are the problem.

Oh, come on! wrote:

How can anybody see Dibaba's name at the top of this list and not seriously consider the prospect that she's doping?

http://www.alltime-athletics.com/w_1500ok.htm

Irrelevant to this topic.

parkway wrote:

Her sister is the best 10,000m runner ever; why shouldn't she be the best female miler ever?

Wang Junxia is the best (female) 10,000 runner ever.

smile wrote:

Jeff Albertson wrote:

@swift_girl posts about drug cheats all damn day. Seems to think any Africans (or NOP) is doping. Offers no proof other than Britain can't produce any other sub-28 10k guys.

She looks pretty fit in her selfies though, I'll give her that.

What proof do you want her to give, exactly?

So unless one has proof, one shouldn't speculate about doping?

Much as I speculate that the tweeter in question molests collies.

Sure, the outdoor 1500 record raises eyebrows.

But if you accept that, then the recent indoor times do not.

Women should be at 3:50 flat by now.

In 1980 if you told me the 1500m record would be 3:50 flat in 2015 I wouldn't think of it as fast.

It took 35 years to drop less than 2 1/2 seconds.

In 35 years the men's record went from 3:52 to 3:36.

And over the same period the women went from 3:52 to 3:50 (1980 - 2015) the men went from 3:32 to 3:26.

The women should at least be at 3:46 by now.

Why the terrible progression?

It's interesting how in the last 9 months just about every source of Epstien's has been shown to be of questionable judgment