Front page - The year of doping - then putting a picture of Al Salazar is BullSh*t!

the end is near for old man Salazar

pHILIrunner wrote:

subliminal messages in his tone gets you hooked on the idea that Salazar was charged/convicted of drugs...another low in 2015, will 2016 continue same BS..

I agree. There were plenty of big names that were actually busted this year.... not that I hold him high regard (eg the grey area stuff he did like having Ritz inject peptides or whatever is was which were subsequently band), but use a pic of a convict

Salazar has admitted that he can "understand how a good moral person might feel compelled" to dope. What more do you need? What if I said I could understand how a good moral person might feel compelled to rape? Might you think that I would be a potential rapist? Of course, and when you combine Alberto's statement with all the other evidence, it is as plain as day that Alberto has doped his athletes.

I agree, use a picture of someone who was actually busted for doping.

norphxc wrote:

I agree, use a picture of someone who was actually busted for doping.

Well, perhaps Alberto has been caught and you don't know it yet...

Big things will be released before January is done. I'm very surprised that nothing has leaked yet already.

True. They should've used a picture of Paula.

Looks like this may be the year we start on the road towards legalization of PEDs. The discussion is underway in the media. In DC and state houses around the country we're seeing the end of "the war on drugs" and this is the next logical step.

We can live in the past or we can progress and die, which will our sport choose?

Ogdenite wrote:

Looks like this may be the year we start on the road towards legalization of PEDs. The discussion is underway in the media. In DC and state houses around the country we're seeing the end of "the war on drugs" and this is the next logical step.

We can live in the past or we can progress and die, which will our sport choose?

That's great. What dope are you going to force your kid to take to be competitive? It starts early you know. 12-13 at least.

What needle size? When do you teach your kid to do their own injections? Please tell us all about it.

Doping is all good until we are talking about your kids, then suddenly the rules change. Am I right?

Not at all. My kids don't smoke, don't drink to excess and are good young adults. I'm sure they've had access to all types of drugs but have not chosen that path.

I was a very competitive runner and know I was very likely beaten by athletes using PEDs. I don't care, never did and never will. They made their choices and I make mine.

Prohibition and regulations to dictate entirely personal behavior will always fail.

Plain as day wrote:

True. They should've used a picture of Paula.

Indeed.

That photo along with their usual gibberish just underscores their lack of credibility. They call clean people dirty, call their dirty friends clean, and play a part in having clean runners banned.

This is exactly what the drug war is about, which is why it should be done away with immediately.

J.R. wrote:

Plain as day wrote:

True. They should've used a picture of Paula.

Indeed.

That photo along with their usual gibberish just underscores their lack of credibility. They call clean people dirty, call their dirty friends clean, and play a part in having clean runners banned.

This is exactly what the drug war is about, which is why it should be done away with immediately.

Every NOPer is a doper. Bobblehead Radcliffe is also a doper. Those are facts beyond dispute.

The picture should have been paula hugging sleazy.

kdeomvoe wrote:

norphxc wrote:

I agree, use a picture of someone who was actually busted for doping.

Well, perhaps Alberto has been caught and you don't know it yet...

Then the article and headline should say that. Putting the picture of someone with no conviction for drug use against his name alongside that headline is some bottom of the barrel sh** by LRC. Even replacing corruption with "scandal" would be a small step to legitimize the layout ... But as it is, it's pretty lame.

However I hope Nike sues the Brojos and puts them out of business.

I don't like Nike wrote:

However I hope Nike sues the Brojos and puts them out of business.

What would be the grounds for the lawsuit? Please elaborate...

Sleazy doped his own son. But I agree. They should have put up a pic of Rupp instead.

kdeomvoe wrote:

I don't like Nike wrote:

However I hope Nike sues the Brojos and puts them out of business.

What would be the grounds for the lawsuit? Please elaborate...

Legal grounds.

Stupid journalists wrote:

kdeomvoe wrote:

What would be the grounds for the lawsuit? Please elaborate...

Legal grounds.

A judge would laugh you out of court if that was the nature of the complaint...