There's a difference between the next ten largest cities - this would include surveying every city in the world that was near the population of the biggest city near me - and the next nearest ten large cities from me. Welcome to English 101! It is very easy to ask my regional friends if their papers have covered this and have them each say no. It is also easy to google Salazar and the the names of the regional papers. Welcome to Networking 101 (and having friends)!Seriously, read McGowan's book. The evidence for an MK-Ultra conspiracy centered around the San Fernando Valley is a slam dunk compared to a handful of people, most who remain anonymous, saying they "saw things." Shoot, there is more evidence for Bigfoot. When most of these athletes - especially the ones who have not yet retired - admits to taking the drugs themselves, I will wake up. Until then this is simply an impossible scenario. "We saw all these drug violations but neither we nor any of our friends did it in spite of the fact that we were in all other ways a part of the same protocols" does not fly. Sorry.And for the record, he said/she said are not facts.
runDirtyrun wrote:
Frank "Fascist" Zappa wrote:Neither my local paper, nor the paper from the nearest large city has covered this non story. Nor have the papers from the next ten nearest large cities. They have also not covered the story that the CIA concocted the "counterculture" in the Laurel Canyon area of Los Angeles in the late 60s early 70s in order to discredit the ant-war movement. The latter actually has far more evidence to support it.
Very interesting and thorough response for a "non-story." Do you always track the news from the next ten largest cities?
I like the attempt at shaming anyone who would take the facts collected by ProPublica/BBC seriously.
4/10 for creative use of imaginary details.