I am having a debate with my girlfriend in regards to whether or not a female marathoner's failure to sometimes have a period is a bodily safety mechanism in relation to low body fat percentage. She has given me some material to read and referred to something called the "female triad" while dismissing my argument as a huge societal misconception.
Moreover, when we discussed body fat percentages in men, I stated that anything over 15% is very fat. She retorted with a statistic claiming that up to 25% in physically active (not athletic) men is considered healthy. For college athletes, e.g. football players, she said that the statistic is more apt to be in the 8-10% range. I shot back with the practical argument, saying, "You realize that's 1/4 of a man's body you're claiming as fat." Also, when I claimed that some distance runners' bodies have body fat percentages as low as 2%, she scoffed, claiming it as an impossibility. I didn't mention names, such as Frank Shorter, Harold Norporh, Paul Tergat, etc....
What I'm looking for is any scientific information to support my point, that a female distance runner's failure to have a monthly period is her body's safety mechanism due to a lower than normal body fat percentage (again, her argument is that such bodily action isn't a safety mechanism, instead the absence of menstruation is the sign of distinct malnutrition in relation to exercise output).
And for context, she's a nutrition major, I study terrorism and intelligence.