Ok I know the prior vioation this runner had was for steroids something that makes some kind of sense to me for a sprinter (I do not agree with doping of any kind it just is fairly logical that if you do sprints and are willing to cheat steroids are kind of a logical choice)
But why EPO for a 400? 800m it would make more sense (still cheating mind you, but at least somewhat logical - in a dishonest kind of way), but a 400 at this guys speed is the very, very low end of logical to cheat via EPO in my view. Does the risk vs. reward make more sense to someone else on the boards?