Travesty Tygart wrote:
Tygart is a full-of-himself fool. He won't put money into property testing. Instead he "negotiates" deals to catch cheats. If Tygart thinks you are guilty, but you're not, you must confess to avoid having your reputation destroyed by this fool. Sure, Tygart will catch a few drug cheats and catch a few non-drug cheats. But, many drug cheats will be set free because they negotiated.
I am confused...
1) USADA has a finite amount of money. It allocates some to research and some to outreach and education, but it is not an unlimited pot of money. So how much should be put forth for testing? (And do this without looking up how much it actually spends or has in its annual budget). Now I think it has stretched a bit beyond its mission with some aspects like True Sport (a noble idea, but I question the benefits).
2) Tygart cannot just think you are guilty, he must have evidence either through testing or other means (records of drugs being shipped to your house or records at places like BALCO that implicate you). He long thought that Landis, Hamilton and Armstrong were doping and all confessed to it.
3) Pretty funny that someone on Letsrun would be concerned about an athlete's reputation considering so many here post allegations that are probably based on less evidence than Tygart has when he seeks punishment.
4) Negotiating with drug cheats can be advantageous if it leads to stopping someone from being involved in cheating. Sort of like giving a petty criminal a deal to roll over on a network of criminals.
Full disclosure I know Travis. We are not friends, but we know each other. At one time I thought he was crazy to go after Armstrong, but at some point I learned enough to realize that Tygart was on solid ground to pursue him. If you cannot put away arguably the greatest doper in the history of sport, then you are not going to credible in getting others.